[Cluster-tech] PC41 replacement
Dirk Koopman G1TLH
gb7tlh at dxcluster.org
Mon Sep 7 23:33:27 BST 2009
Lee Sawkins wrote:
> Hi Dirk and others.
>
> I would like to replace the PC41 protocol for CC Clusters. Dirk, some
> time ago I remember you mentioning you were looking into replacing PC41s
> as well. I have heard nothing recently. If you have a design for your
> protocol, I would like to see it. Perhaps I could use it. Otherwise,
> what I am proposing to do is introduce a PC91 message, similar to the
> existing PC92/PC93 messages. Will this cause anyone a problem? If not
> a PC91, then any suggestions to another message number? If Spider sees
> this message, could it at as a minimum decrement the hops and pass it on
> to other Spider clusters as well as CC Clusters?
>
> This message would include all the data currently passed in PC41s and be
> expandable to include other items if desired. ie IOTA number, RDA etc.
>
> The format I plan to use would be of the type
>
> PC91^VE7CC-1^65205.01^version^VA6AAA^1^Lee^2^Maple Ridge BC^3^49 11 N
> 122 30 W^4^VE7CC-1^5^CN89^H99^
>
> These items are ^orig node^time^PC91 protocol version^user call^item 1
> of PC41^item 1 data^item 2 of PC41^item 2 data^... up to item 5 data of
> PC41 and then additional items not currently included in the PC41
> protocol.
>
> It would be optional how many items of data are passed in one message.
> A minimum of one and a maximum of all items. Each item type (name,
> location etc) would be identified by the number immediately proceeding
> it.
>
> Comments?
>
I would rather not use PC91, just in case there are still some old (pre
1.54) DXSpider nodes out there that still use it. I will get back to you
on a number (probably PC94). I would like fewer fields:-
PC91^VE7CC-1^65205.01^version^VA6AAA^1Lee^2Maple Ridge BC^349 11 N 122
30 W^4VE7CC-1^5CN89^H99^
i.e. the first digit/letter is the field type/name.
and I am presuming that "version" would be a number (eg '1' or maybe '5')?
and not all fields need be populated.
and ^2^ means that field type 2 is now empty.
Dirk G1TLH
More information about the Cluster-tech
mailing list