[Dxspider-support] Add IP address tp PC16

Keith Le Boutillier keith at cwgsy.net
Wed Dec 16 21:46:22 GMT 2009


Hi Steve 

I am using GIT for windows here and after a bit of playing around with
it I have it working and I am updating my windows spider ok using GIT

In the latest version Dirk has rewritten the QRZ command to use the XML
interface for which QRZ make a charge for its use.

73 Keith GB7DXG-1  

-----Original Message-----
From: dxspider-support-bounces at dxcluster.org
[mailto:dxspider-support-bounces at dxcluster.org] On Behalf Of Steve -
AA4U
Sent: 16 December 2009 21:01
To: The DXSpider Support list
Subject: Re: [Dxspider-support] Add IP address tp PC16

Right now, I'd be happy with just having the SH/QRZ command working !!!

BTW, I'm still unable to update DXSpider past build 0.52 via tarball or 
WinCVS.

Thanks in advance.

73, Steve - AA4U


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Anthony J. Cioffi (N2KI)" <n2ki at amsat.org>
To: "'The DXSpider Support list'" <dxspider-support at dxcluster.org>
Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 6:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Dxspider-support] Add IP address tp PC16


> Dirk,
>
> In the interest of change, I would really like to see the sysop have
the 
> choice of allowing the sh/qrz command accessible to
> registered users or not; if you can.
>
>
> Anthony - N2KI
> 30MDG - 1187
> www.n2ki.com
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dxspider-support-bounces at dxcluster.org 
> [mailto:dxspider-support-bounces at dxcluster.org] On Behalf Of Dirk
Koopman 
> G1TLH
> Sent: Monday, December 14, 2009 2:39 PM
> To: The DXSpider Support list
> Subject: Re: [Dxspider-support] Add IP address tp PC16
>
> Dirk Koopman G1TLH wrote:
>> Lee Sawkins wrote:
>>> The most important use for DX Clusters is to distribute DX spots.
Yet
>>> these DX spots account for a minor amount of the traffic.  The PC92
>>> traffic is many times the DX spot traffic.  This is mainly the "who
is
>>> connected" traffic.  If you could turn off the PC92 traffic for all
your
>>> node links except one or two reliable ones, you would greatly reduce
>>> your backbone traffic and not lose anything.  Better yet, only use a
>>> couple of node links.
>>
>> My take on this subject is probably not as simple as Lee's. From
where I
>> sit, I see only a very moderate increase in abuse (whether in spots
or
>> other avenues), certainly compared to previous abusive events that we
>> have seen on here.
>>
>
> etc etc
>
> It's all gone very quiet. Is that it then? Do I just get on with it?
>
> Dirk
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at dxcluster.org
> http://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at dxcluster.org
> http://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> 


_______________________________________________
Dxspider-support mailing list
Dxspider-support at dxcluster.org
http://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support






More information about the Dxspider-support mailing list