[Dxspider-support] Australian 4 letter calls
Radioman
radioman01 at comcast.net
Fri Nov 20 13:46:50 GMT 2009
If there are so few then can a debase of excepted call signs be built and
implemented? To get around this problem. If a bad words list can be used how
about a list of accepted calls
Tony
NN1D
-----Original Message-----
From: dxspider-support-bounces at dxcluster.org
[mailto:dxspider-support-bounces at dxcluster.org] On Behalf Of Dirk Koopman
G1TLH
Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 07:00
To: The DXSpider Support list
Subject: Re: [Dxspider-support] Australian 4 letter calls
Brendan Minish wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-11-20 at 11:03 +0000, Ian Maude wrote:
>> However, they have a callsign that is recognised by the Australian
>> authorities and we cannot discriminate just because they only have one
>> foot on the ladder.
>
> The issue I would have with 4 letter calls (& longer..) is how all the
> other nodes on the network will handle spots, talk, ann etc. Isn't there
> a real risk that not all nodes will handle 4 letter calls properly
> They are also a non runner over packet.
>
> Perhaps we should allow 4 letter calls to connect but not spot, talk or
> ann (beyond the local node anyway)
> Surely that's enough cluster access to support logging software and get
> one's feet wet yet protects the rest of the cluster network from
> unintended consequences.
>
> for example..
> vk4abcd posts on a node, some other node (possibly running something
> ancient and now unsupported ) in the network parses this differently
> and truncates it to VK4ABC and we have dupe spots, one with an invalid
> originating call
>
I have reverted the change.
Sorry Ian.
The downside is too great. Also, in the current climate it also gives a
greater opportunity to be clever with rude, fake, logins.
Dirk
_______________________________________________
Dxspider-support mailing list
Dxspider-support at dxcluster.org
http://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
More information about the Dxspider-support
mailing list