[Dxspider-support] filter question "user_default"
Dirk Koopman
djk at tobit.co.uk
Tue Nov 19 15:09:16 CET 2019
Saki
I'm sorry but I don't think I can do this. Also, I'm not at all
convinced that it's a good idea because filtering is not intuitive -
especially when layering one filter upon another.
I'm struggling to see a reason why you would want to control or even
influence what a user filters. I guarantee that users will want things
that you have applied filters to.
If you want to control what your node will allow (e.g. by_zone 2,3,4)
then the way to deal with that is with input filters or even better set
the (output) filters for your node on your feeder node (using e.g. rcmd
<feeder node callsign> accept/spot by_zone 2,3,4). This means that your
feeder nodes won't send you spots that you don't want. I believe this is
used a lot in the US. If you do this, you should still set an input
node_default filter to catch any ephemeral nodes that connect to you.
73 Dirk G1TLH
On 19/11/2019 13:30, dd5xx--- via Dxspider-support wrote:
> Hi all,
> I experienced that whenever a user sets a personal filter (eg.
> "accept/spots by_zone 3,4,5") it will ignore the user_default ones. It
> behaves like the filter set by the user replaced (!) the user_default one.
> I would like to get the result so the filter that a user sets will be
> set additionally (!) to the existing user_default ones. How can this
> be done ? thanks in advance
> 73 // Saki, DD5XX
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20191119/94443a8d/attachment.html>
More information about the Dxspider-support
mailing list