[Dxspider-support] Responder: baddx and badword bug?

[joaquin]

I have 3 nodes, one in the 440 and the other two with the 442. The error only appeared in the two with the 442, it is very rare.   
  
I'll reload version 442 to see what happens. Thank Luigi and Dan for your answers.   
  

  
Kin
  

  

  
  
  
  
  
>   
> El 22 ago. 2022 en 13:09, Danilo Brelih via Dxspider-support  <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>  escribió:
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
> Kin.
>   
> Working   without any problems with 442 here.
>   
>
>   
> 73
>   
> Dan S50U
>   
>   
>   
>   
>  set/badword numer 0xs sorte0-
>   
>  NUMER0XS already exists in badword
>   
>  SORTE0- added to badword
>   
>  S50U de S50CLX 22-Aug-2022 1101Z 2.4481    dxspider  >
>   
>   
>   
>   
>   
>     
> ----- Dne 22. Avg. 2022 ob 11:27 je The DXSpider Support list  <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>  napisal(a):
>   
>   
> >  Hi,
> >   
> >  I just noticed that using mojo version 442 when using the set/baddx and
> >  set/badword commands, I get the response: "not allowed".
> >   
> >  set/baddx EA7XMU EA7IMS                      (due to usurpation or non-existence of
> >  callsign)
> >  set/badword NUMER0xS SORTE0-
> >   
> >  I have tried with the 440 and both commands work fine.
> >   
> >  Regards.
> >   
> >  Kin EA3CV
> >   
> >   
> >   
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  Dxspider-support mailing list
> >  Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> >  https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support       
>     
>   
>  _______________________________________________  
> Dxspider-support mailing list  
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk   
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support   
>     
     
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20220822/7835ea7d/attachment-0001.htm>