[Dxspider-support] Total nodes

Fri Jan 7 10:00:23 GMT 2022

Hello all,
here running Spider V1.57 build 413 (the latest).

Looking inside, I've noted that with the commands "sh/node" and 
"sh/version", starting from this build number, the Spider nodes running 
the old master branch has the build number presented with 4 digits 
instead of the standard 3 digits (i.e. it is present a 0 before the 
build's number on the nodes running the master branch version).
See below:

sh/no
Node Call   Sort    Version
7N4TWL-7    Spider  1.55 build: 0216
F4IAA-3     Spider  1.55 build: 0217
IK2WAD-6    Spider  1.57 build: 413
IK5PWJ-6    Spider  1.57 build: 413
IK5ZUK-6    Spider  1.57
IK6IHL-6    Spider  1.57 build: 413
IK8HJC-6    Spider  1.57 build: 412
IZ3MEZ-8    Spider  1.57 build: 315
IZ5FSA-6    Spider  1.57 build: 413
IZ6RND-6    Spider  1.55 build: 0216
IZ7AUH-6    Spider  1.57 build: 413
LU9DA-6     Spider  1.57 build: 332
S50DXS      Spider  1.57 build: 412
SV5FRI-1    Spider  1.57 build: 412
VE3CGR-5    Spider  1.57 build: 413
15 records

Now my question (for Dirk): is this a wanted effect or not ?

73 Luigi IK5ZUK

Il 07/01/2022 09:40, Joaquin . via Dxspider-support ha scritto:
> Ian, I think it stabilises over time.
> When I took that screenshot, the cluster had started a few minutes ago.
> Now 50 minutes later:
>
>  EA4URE-2 5457     Yes Yes
>  EA4URE-3 5457 400 Yes Yes
>  EA4URE-5 5457 400 Yes Yes
>
> Kin
>
>
> El vie, 7 ene 2022 a las 9:08, Ian Maude via Dxspider-support 
> (<dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>) escribió:
>
>     It shows up fine on GB7MBC running 412
>
>
>
>
>     73 Ian
>
>>     On 7 Jan 2022, at 08:01, Joaquin . via Dxspider-support
>>     <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>     Hi Dirk,
>>
>>     Interesting new modification, but I see that there are values
>>     that do not correspond to what is actually running on some nodes.
>>     For example:
>>     ...
>>     EA4URE-2 5401     Yes Yes
>>     EA4URE-3 5457 400 Yes Yes
>>     EA4URE-5 5401     Yes Yes
>>     ...
>>
>>     these 3 nodes are in build 400.
>>
>>     Kin
>>
>>
>>
>>     El jue, 6 ene 2022 a las 19:19, Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support
>>     (<dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>) escribió:
>>
>>         On the mojo branch: "show/version all" will also give you a
>>         total. Which, today, on GB7DJK, happily, gives the same
>>         answer as show/cluster. Tomorrow, or indeed in an hour's
>>         time, the answers may vary :-)
>>
>>         Dirk G1TLH
>>
>>         On 06/01/2022 17:30, Joaquin . via Dxspider-support wrote:
>>>         It was a mistake of mine when obtaining the data after the
>>>         start of the cluster. The values are correct and identical.
>>>         I have to be careful with the values returned by the
>>>         methods in perl hihihi
>>>
>>>         73 Kin
>>>
>>>
>>>         El jue., 6 ene. 2022 17:58, Normando IZ6FXS via
>>>         Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> escribió:
>>>
>>>             And the solution is?
>>>
>>>             N
>>>
>>>>             Il giorno 6 gen 2022, alle ore 13:10, Joaquin . via
>>>>             Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> ha scritto:
>>>>
>>>>             Solved.
>>>>             Sri
>>>>
>>>>             Kin
>>>>
>>>>             El jue, 6 ene 2022 a las 9:28, Joaquin .
>>>>             (<joaquin at cronux.net>) escribió:
>>>>
>>>>                 Hi,
>>>>
>>>>                 Why is there a difference in the totals given by
>>>>                 the command sh/cluster and stat/route_node all? For
>>>>                 example the first gives 904 and the second 347.
>>>>
>>>>                 Kin
>>>>
>>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>>             Dxspider-support mailing list
>>>>             Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>>>>             https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>>
>>>             _______________________________________________
>>>             Dxspider-support mailing list
>>>             Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>>>             https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>>
>>>
>>>         _______________________________________________
>>>         Dxspider-support mailing list
>>>         Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>>>         https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         Dxspider-support mailing list
>>         Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>>         https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Dxspider-support mailing list
>>     Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>>     https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     Dxspider-support mailing list
>     Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>     https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support

-- 
Questa email è stata esaminata alla ricerca di virus da AVG.
http://www.avg.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20220107/db84a3fb/attachment-0001.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Screenshot%202022-01-07%20at%2008.06.12.png
Type: image/png
Size: 14704 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20220107/db84a3fb/attachment-0001.png>