[Dxspider-support] bands.pl

IZ2LSC iz2lsc.andrea at gmail.com
Sat Dec 21 20:56:51 GMT 2024


Thanks Keith,
changed like this

'30m' => bless( { band => [ 10100, 10150 ],
                                                        cw => [ 10100,
10130 ],
                                                        data => [ 10130,
10150 ] ,
                                                        ft8 => [ 10136,
10139 ],
                                                        ft4 => [ 10140,
10143 ],
                                                        rtty => [ 10141,
10149 ]
                                                  }, 'Bands'),

file is always available here

https://github.com/iz2lsc/dxspider-bands/blob/main/bands.pl

73
Andrea, iz2lsc


-->


Il giorno sab 21 dic 2024 alle ore 10:35 Keith Maton via Dxspider-support <
dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> ha scritto:

> Just spotted a typo in the most recent version.
>
> The CW section of 30m is set to 10000, 10140 when it should be 10100,
> 10140 (or even 10100, 10130).
>
> 73 Keith
>
>
>
> On 18 Oct 2024, at 20:05, Keith Maton via Dxspider-support <
> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
>
> I’ve just been through this one,I think we’ve cracked it and it can be
> added.
>
> Thanks Andy and Andrea.
>
> 73 Keith
>
>
>
>
> On 18 Oct 2024, at 16:08, IZ2LSC via Dxspider-support <
> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
>
> Thanks Andy,
> I think there is a typo here
>
> You could add FT8 - 5357 – 5340 for 6m.
> It should be
> You could add FT8 - 5357 – *5360* for 60m.
>
> I added Andy's suggestions.
> New file can be downloaded here
> https://github.com/iz2lsc/dxspider-bands/blob/main/bands.pl
> -->
>
>
> Il giorno mer 16 ott 2024 alle ore 15:02 <g4piq at btinternet.com> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Dirks suggested you speak with me since I made some of the previous
>> changes. This looks good. I had thought about making the FT8/4 segments 4
>> kHz wide rather than 3 kHz, but in reality it seems there are no/very few
>> spots above a 3 kHz audio frequency – so 3 kHz as you have implemented
>> works better and avoid dropping RTTY / SSB spots  if you had rej/ft8
>> selected – though it’s a real minor corner case.
>>
>>
>>
>> Just a few suggestions…
>>
>>
>>
>> I would add 50323-50326 to the 6m FT8 range – it’s a commonly used 2nd
>> slot for inter-continental FT8.
>>
>> Also, you could add FT8 70154-70157 for 4m, 144174-144177 for 2m and
>> 432174-432177 for 70cm.
>>
>> You could add FT8 - 5357 – 5340 for 6m.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73
>>
>>
>>
>> Andy, G4PIQ
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Dxspider-support <dxspider-support-bounces at tobit.co.uk> *On
>> Behalf Of *IZ2LSC via Dxspider-support
>> *Sent:* 16 October 2024 09:30
>> *To:* The DXSpider Support list <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
>> *Cc:* IZ2LSC <iz2lsc.andrea at gmail.com>
>> *Subject:* Re: [Dxspider-support] bands.pl
>>
>>
>>
>> new file here
>>
>>
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jBDNTcZgEVidWPycXPXhGdMgirPNW2CK/view?usp=sharing
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>> -->
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Il giorno mar 15 ott 2024 alle ore 23:29 Keith Maton via Dxspider-support
>> <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> ha scritto:
>>
>> This process about copying the file to /spider/local_data is what I was
>> saying in my earlier email (I said *"The supplied bands.pl
>> <http://bands.pl/> is in /spider/data.  I know better than to overwrite
>> files there so should this be placed in /spider/local_data?”*)
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve just spent the last hour trying to make it work with no success.
>>
>>
>>
>> If I copy bands.pl over to /spider/local_data and edit it there, then
>> load it using load/bands and reload the filters as a user, it’s still using
>> the file in /spider/data
>>
>>
>>
>> I can see this very quickly because if I do a *show/dx filter real 30*,
>> I’m getting spots that should be filtered out.
>>
>>
>>
>> Editing the file in /spider/data, updating using load/bands and reloading
>> the filters, it’s working as expected but it simply doesn’t seem to load
>> the file from /spider/local_data.
>>
>>
>>
>> Yes, the permissions were correct (sysop:sysop).
>>
>>
>>
>> Can anyone else test this please?
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrea, 30m needs changing on your version.  It should be 10136,10139 for
>> FT8, not 10131,10134 (my mistake on my earlier message).
>>
>>
>>
>> 73 Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15 Oct 2024, at 19:10, Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support <
>> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> (Andrea) Please don't do that. When an update is installed it will reset
>> your /spider/data/bands.pl and you will lose all your changes.
>>
>> The correct thing to do is to copy /spider/data/band.pl to
>> /spider/local_data and modify it there. A 'load/bands' will pick your
>> modified version as the modification date is newer than the one in
>> /spider/data. If there is an update then the one in /spider/data will be
>> used but - importantly - your version in /spider/local_data will not
>> change. So you *could* 'touch /spider/local_data/bands.pl' to get your
>> version back again.
>>
>> The (system) bands.pl changes very rarely, in fact it was changed this
>> year for the first time since 2021. I am open to suggestions for changes,
>> particularly for new mode band sections (assuming that they are stable).
>> Please coordinate with Andy G4PIQ as he knows more about band plans than I
>> do. If your changes are more general then I would be happy to incorporate
>> them.
>>
>> 73 Dirk
>>
>>
>> On 15/10/2024 13:41, IZ2LSC via Dxspider-support wrote:
>>
>> you can rename the original file as bands.old and copy the modified one
>> in the /spider/data.
>>
>>
>>
>> Then you have to run the command load/bands
>>
>>
>>
>> No reboot is needed
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>>
>> -->
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Il giorno mar 15 ott 2024 alle ore 11:18 Keith Maton via Dxspider-support
>> <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> ha scritto:
>>
>> Understood Andrea,
>>
>>
>>
>> I didn’t look beyond the new entries and hadn’t spotted you’d added them
>> to the data segments.
>>
>>
>>
>> The supplied bands.pl is in /spider/data.  I know better than to
>> overwrite files there so should this be placed in /spider/local_data?
>> Does spider need to be restarted in order to use the replacement file?
>>
>>
>>
>> Dirk, are you happy to take a look over this and consider implementing it
>> in a future release if you’re happy with it?
>>
>>
>>
>> 73 Keith
>>
>>
>>
>> On 15 Oct 2024, at 06:59, IZ2LSC <iz2lsc.andrea at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi Keith,
>>
>> FT* frequencies were added as data mode and as well as specific mode
>> using ft8/ft4 name to have more granularity if you want to block only
>> ft8/ft4.
>>
>> And yes, you already have the specific filter for RTTY.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you look at the first example in my previous email you can see that
>> FT* frequencies are included in the data mode.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>>
>> -->
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Il giorno lun 14 ott 2024 alle ore 23:11 Keith Maton via Dxspider-support
>> <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> ha scritto:
>>
>> Hi Andrea,
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, but shouldn’t these be included as data, rather than given new
>> names?  I mean, by definition, FT8 and FT4 are data modes.  I don’t think
>> they need to be differentiated, we don’t have separate filters for RTTY and
>> PSK, it’s all just data.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73 Keith
>>
>>
>>
>> On 14 Oct 2024, at 21:15, IZ2LSC <iz2lsc.andrea at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I modified the bands.pl file.
>>
>> You can download it from here:
>> https://drive.google.com/file/d/1mfwKtz7WxhWMK16KLjp9GzAsLAiQ5tEx/view?usp=sharing
>>
>>
>>
>> Below some filter examples with the detailed freq range.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>> iz2lsc
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *rej/spot on all/data*
>>
>>
>>
>> "filter1":{
>>       "reject":{
>>          "asc":"(($r->[0]>=1838 && $r->[0]<=1843) || ($r->[0]>=3570 &&
>> $r->[0]<=3619) || ($r->[0]>=5366 && $r->[0]<=5467) || ($r->[0]>=7040 &&
>> $r->[0]<=7100) || ($r->[0]>=10141 && $r->[0]<=10149) || ($r->[0]>=10131 &&
>> $r->[0]<=10134) || ($r->[0]>=10140 && $r->[0]<=10143) || ($r->[0]>=14070 &&
>> $r->[0]<=14098) || ($r->[0]>=14101 && $r->[0]<=14111) || ($r->[0]>=18100 &&
>> $r->[0]<=18108) || ($r->[0]>=21070 && $r->[0]<=21119) || ($r->[0]>=21140 &&
>> $r->[0]<=21143) || ($r->[0]>=24920 && $r->[0]<=24929) || ($r->[0]>=24915 &&
>> $r->[0]<=24918) || ($r->[0]>=28050 && $r->[0]<=28149) || ($r->[0]>=29200 &&
>> $r->[0]<=29299) || ($r->[0]>=28180 && $r->[0]<=28183) || ($r->[0]>=50300 &&
>> $r->[0]<=50500) || ($r->[0]>=5670000 && $r->[0]<=5700000))",
>>          "code":null,
>>          "user":"on all/data"
>>
>>
>>
>> *rej/spot on all/ft8*
>>
>>
>>
>> "filter1":{
>>       "reject":{
>>          "asc":"(($r->[0]>=1840 && $r->[0]<=1843) || ($r->[0]>=3573 &&
>> $r->[0]<=3576) || ($r->[0]>=7074 && $r->[0]<=7077) || ($r->[0]>=10131 &&
>> $r->[0]<=10134) || ($r->[0]>=14074 && $r->[0]<=14077) || ($r->[0]>=18100 &&
>> $r->[0]<=18103) || ($r->[0]>=21074 && $r->[0]<=21077) || ($r->[0]>=24915 &&
>> $r->[0]<=24918) || ($r->[0]>=28074 && $r->[0]<=28077) || ($r->[0]>=50313 &&
>> $r->[0]<=50316))",
>>          "code":null,
>>          "user":"on all/ft8"
>>       }
>>
>>
>>
>> *rej/spot on all/ft4*
>>
>>
>>
>> "filter1":{
>>       "reject":{
>>          "asc":"(($r->[0]>=3575 && $r->[0]<=3578) || ($r->[0]>=7047 &&
>> $r->[0]<=7051) || ($r->[0]>=10140 && $r->[0]<=10143) || ($r->[0]>=14080 &&
>> $r->[0]<=14083) || ($r->[0]>=18104 && $r->[0]<=18107) || ($r->[0]>=21140 &&
>> $r->[0]<=21143) || ($r->[0]>=24919 && $r->[0]<=24922) || ($r->[0]>=28180 &&
>> $r->[0]<=28183) || ($r->[0]>=50318 && $r->[0]<=50321))",
>>          "code":null,
>>          "user":"on all/ft4"
>>       }
>>    },
>>
>>
>>
>> *rej/spot on 20m/ft8*
>>
>>
>>
>> "filter1":{
>>       "reject":{
>>          "asc":"(($r->[0]>=14074 && $r->[0]<=14077))",
>>          "code":null,
>>          "user":"on 20m/ft8"
>>       }
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *rej/spot on all/ft8 or on all/ft4*
>>
>>
>>
>> "filter1":{
>>       "reject":{
>>          "asc":"(($r->[0]>=1840 && $r->[0]<=1843) || ($r->[0]>=3573 &&
>> $r->[0]<=3576) || ($r->[0]>=7074 && $r->[0]<=7077) || ($r->[0]>=10131 &&
>> $r->[0]<=10134) || ($r->[0]>=14074 && $r->[0]<=14077) || ($r->[0]>=18100 &&
>> $r->[0]<=18103) || ($r->[0]>=21074 && $r->[0]<=21077) || ($r->[0]>=24915 &&
>> $r->[0]<=24918) || ($r->[0]>=28074 && $r->[0]<=28077) || ($r->[0]>=50313 &&
>> $r->[0]<=50316)) || (($r->[0]>=3575 && $r->[0]<=3578) || ($r->[0]>=7047 &&
>> $r->[0]<=7051) || ($r->[0]>=10140 && $r->[0]<=10143) || ($r->[0]>=14080 &&
>> $r->[0]<=14083) || ($r->[0]>=18104 && $r->[0]<=18107) || ($r->[0]>=21140 &&
>> $r->[0]<=21143) || ($r->[0]>=24919 && $r->[0]<=24922) || ($r->[0]>=28180 &&
>> $r->[0]<=28183) || ($r->[0]>=50318 && $r->[0]<=50321))",
>>          "code":null,
>>          "user":"on all/ft8 or on all/ft4"
>>       }
>>
>> -->
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Il giorno dom 13 ott 2024 alle ore 11:30 Keith Maton via Dxspider-support
>> <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> ha scritto:
>>
>> That’s what I’ve done, the frequency pairs I listed are the base FT8 and
>> FT4 frequencies for each band, plus 3kHz.  FT8 is often spotted as the base
>> frequency plus the offset people are transmitting on so yes, it could be up
>> to 3kHz above the base.
>>
>>
>>
>> At the moment, if someone sets a filter *rej/spot on all/data*, it
>> doesn’t block FT8 or FT4 on all bands.  The data filter should block
>> *all* data, including FT4/8 and adding these pairs to bands.pl will fix
>> that.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73 Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 13 Oct 2024, at 10:10, Kin EA3CV via Dxspider-support <
>> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> I would propose at least a 3/4 kHz range to ensure that the spot
>> frequency is always in the defined range.
>>
>> It would be interesting if those who usually use the various digital
>> modes prepared their ranges.
>>
>>
>>
>> Kin EA3CV
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>>
>> *De:* IZ2LSC <iz2lsc.andrea at gmail.com>
>> *Enviado:* domingo, octubre 13, 2024 10:33:24 a. m.
>> *Para:* The DXSpider Support list <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
>> *CC:* Kin <ea3cv at cronux.net>
>> *Asunto:* Re: [Dxspider-support] bands.pl
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> this change is quite easy to implement in bands.pl
>>
>> I'm not so expert on FT8. Do we really want to block the whole range?
>>
>> I mean, i.e, for ft8 on 20m is it better to block only 14074 or from
>> 14074 to 14077 ?
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrea
>>
>>
>>
>> -->
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Il giorno sab 12 ott 2024 alle ore 19:15 Kin via Dxspider-support <
>> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> ha scritto:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>
>>
>> Good idea, Keith.
>>
>> I'm busy with other things at the moment, but I'll make a note of it in
>> case no one else is up for it.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73 de Kin EA3CV
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *De:* Dxspider-support <dxspider-support-bounces at tobit.co.uk> *En nombre
>> de *Keith Maton via Dxspider-support
>> *Enviado el:* sábado, 12 de octubre de 2024 16:01
>> *Para:* The DXSpider Support list <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
>> *CC:* Keith Maton <g6nhu at me.com>
>> *Asunto:* Re: [Dxspider-support] bands.pl
>>
>>
>>
>> I’ve been helping a number of my users to filter out FT8 spots and I’ve
>> been setting up frequency segments for them because setting rej/spot
>> filters for data doesn’t seem to work very well with FT8 spots getting
>> through.
>>
>>
>>
>> Looking at bands.pl, I think it’s clear why, a lot of bands don’t have
>> the FT8 frequency specified in the data entry.
>>
>>
>>
>> For example, the main FT8 frequency on 30m is 10,131.000 kHz but bands.pl
>> has 10141, 10149.  I’m not sure if these are spot frequencies or a range
>> from 10141-10149.
>>
>>
>>
>> 17m lists 18101,18108 but the main FT8 frequency for that band is 18100.
>>
>>
>>
>> 12m lists 24920,24929 but the main FT8 frequency is 24915
>>
>>
>>
>> I know bands.pl was updated earlier this year but I think we need some
>> more entries in for FT8/FT4, etc.  If the entries are ranges then it should
>> be straightforward to add additional ones for FT8 and FT4.
>>
>>
>>
>> My suggestions for the primary HF bands.
>>
>>
>>
>> FT8:
>>
>> 1840,1843
>>
>> 3573,3576
>>
>> 7074,7077
>>
>> 10131,10134
>>
>> 14074,14077
>>
>> 18100,18103
>>
>> 24915,24918
>>
>> 28074,28077
>>
>>
>>
>> FT4:
>>
>> 3575,3578
>>
>> 7047,7051
>>
>> 10140,10143
>>
>> 14080,14083
>>
>> 18104,18107
>>
>> 21140,21143
>>
>> 24919,24922
>>
>> 28180,28183
>>
>>
>>
>> I appreciate that there’s slight overlap on some of these and that it
>> won’t stop spots for DXpeditions that operate outside the normal
>> frequencies but if we can get all these added to bands.pl as part of the
>> data segments, it’ll really help us.
>>
>>
>>
>> 73 Keith
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 19 Apr 2024, at 12:11, Kin EA3CV via Dxspider-support <
>> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> It is true that there are users who limit themselves to the exclusive use
>> of the BandMap, but others apply filters from their log/test sw, and these
>> are generally those of the cluster used. We must not forget those who still
>> use the command interface.
>>
>>
>>
>> For a long time banding has evolved very slowly, but lately we have more
>> bands. I would opt for a mixed model, that is, using the IARU band plan and
>> rigorously adapting it to the de facto use of some that have carved out a
>> niche for themselves in the spectrum. To answer, the same.
>>
>>
>>
>> Now I have a first version of the plan for Region I, and it would be
>> interesting if other users could contribute II and III Region. It is recast
>> into a single one and we designate the typical segments.
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>> Kin EA3CV
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Enviado desde Outlook para Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>>
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>>
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20241221/d5ab591d/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Dxspider-support mailing list