[Dxspider-support] Poorly defined connections?

[Rudy Bakalov]

 Where is the documentation that describes the protocol? I have been unable to locate it.
Here's what I am seeing on my end:

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC17^S52NY^S50CLX^H15^

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC16^RW3XA-8^RA3WII - 1^H15^

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC17^SV2HNC^EA6VQ-1^H15^

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC16^EA4URE-2^EA4CZ - 1^EA4IAJ - 1^H15^

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC17^K4BSZ^GB7DXG-1^H15^

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC41^KB9AIT-6^1^GARY HOEHNE^H25^~

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC41^KB9AIT-6^2^NEENAH^H26^~

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC19^1^IZ2LSC-99^0^5457^H15^

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC61^28094.0^CE6CGX^09-Nov-2024^1940Z^ ^N9MSG^AI9T^140.177.87.3^H95^~

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC50^EA3CV-2^15^H99^

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC61^14240.0^NB9QV^09-Nov-2024^1940Z^USS Cobia Vet Say ses^AJ4BH^VE7CC-1^24.213.122.245^H98^~

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC61^1828.4^IZ3NVR^09-Nov-2024^1940Z^ok/om^LY7M^VE7CC-1^83.188.75.252^H98^~

     EA3CV-3 -> 24 PC19^1^IZ3MEZ-8^0^5457^H15^

Rudy N2WQ
    On Saturday, November 9, 2024 at 02:39:09 PM EST, Kin EA3CV <ea3cv at cronux.net> wrote:  
 
 Rudy, but have you analyzed the PC92 sentences you receive from those nodes? Do they reach 5 or 7, or with another value? If you don't get 5 or 7, you have to determine which couple you are getting.For my part, I've analyzed everything I send from EA3CV-3, and how it is received in one of its pairs, and I do not see anything incorrect in the PC92 A, D, C or K. 

Kin EA3CV


De: Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov at yahoo.com>
Enviado: sábado, noviembre 9, 2024 6:48:34 p. m.
Para: 'The DXSpider Support list' <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
CC: Kin <ea3cv at cronux.net>
Asunto: Re: [Dxspider-support] Poorly defined connections?

 I have an almost perpetual problem with EA3CV-3 (DXS), M0KGX-3 (DXS), and DL9GTB-2 (CCC) that most of the time appear to my cluster N2WQ-1 as users, not nodes. I have defined them as nodes, but the setting does not apply 99% of the time. N2WQ-1 runs CC Cluster.
Rudy N2WQ
    On Saturday, November 9, 2024 at 04:17:20 AM EST, Kin via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:  
 
 Hi,

I think I have detected some problems in the information exchanged between
nodes. Possibly as a consequence of an error in the definition of the
neighbour/peer node.

SM7GVF-6 has possibly wrongly defined callsign DL9GTB-1, it should be
DL9GTB-2.
W9TY-1 has possibly wrongly defined callsign K4HNT-1, should be K4HNT-2
IW1QLH-6 has possibly poorly defined callsign NX9G-6, should be NX9G
EI7SDX possibly has ill-defined callsign ON4KST, should be ON4KST-2
ON5MM-2 has possibly ill-defined callsign VK5GR, should be VK5GR-2


The following, I have doubts because I have not been able to trace them:

IW0QNL

1731140467^(chan) <- I HB9VQQ-2 PC92^PY1NB-4^30067^D^^5IW0QNL^H97^
1731115367^(chan) <- I HB9VQQ-2 PC92^PY1NB-4^4967^C^7IW0QNL:5000^H97^

KM3T-5

1731111449^(chan) <- I HB9VQQ-2 PC92^KM3T-10^1049^D^^5KM3T-5^H96^
1731112399^(chan) <- I HB9VQQ-2 PC92^KM3T-10^1999^C^7KM3T-5:5000^H96^

Sysops would be well advised to review their settings. 
In the case of DXSpider, it would be enough to look at its connection file
at: /spider/connect/

73 de Kin EA3CV



_______________________________________________
Dxspider-support mailing list
Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
  
  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20241109/83602d35/attachment-0001.htm>