[Dxspider-support] Incorrect node configurations (II)
Kin
ea3cv at cronux.net
Tue Nov 19 12:08:48 GMT 2024
Morning Björn,
It's been solved.
Before:
PC92^SM7IUN-1^13947^A^^7IW1QLH-2^H95^
After:
PC92^SM7IUN-1^40552^D^^1IW1QLH-2^H95^
The command response only indicates that the change has been made. If you repeat it several times, you will see that it always says the same thing.
You can use the command:
stat/user IW1QLH-2
...
Type of User: U
stat/user SM7IUN-1
...
Seen on PC92 K: Yes
Type of User: S
Or look in user_json.
Thanks for your help.
Kin
EA3CV-2 dxcluster.cronux.net <http://dxcluster.cronux.net> 7300
http://clustermap.cronux.net/map.html
De: Björn Ekelund <bjorn at ekelund.nu>
Enviado el: martes, 19 de noviembre de 2024 11:25
Para: Kin <ea3cv at cronux.net>
CC: The DXSpider Support list <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>; s50u at s50e.si
Asunto: Re: [Dxspider-support] Incorrect node configurations (II)
Thanks Kin, much appreciated.
Neither nodes were connected when I checked but I did the set/user on both SSID and
got "xxx set back as user" which I assume indicated they were both wrongly set as nodes.
Björn
On Mon, Nov 18, 2024 at 8:22 AM Kin <ea3cv at cronux.net <mailto:ea3cv at cronux.net> > wrote:
Björn , I don't know the cause, but I do know that SM7IUN-1 is sending this:
PC92^SM7IUN-1^57345^A^^7IW1QLH-2^H95^
PC92^SM7IUN-1^74067^D^^5IW1QLH-32^H95^
and what it says is that IW1QLH-2 and IW1QLH-32 are nodes, which is wrong.
If you can try what I said:
disc IW1QLH-2
set/user IW1QLH-2
disc IW1QLH-32
set/user IW1QLH-32
we could see if it changes the behaviour.
Kin EA3CV
EA3CV-2 dxcluster.cronux.net <http://dxcluster.cronux.net> 7300
http://clustermap.cronux.net/map.html
De: Björn Ekelund <bjorn at ekelund.nu <mailto:bjorn at ekelund.nu> >
Enviado el: domingo, 17 de noviembre de 2024 19:54
Para: The DXSpider Support list <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk <mailto:dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> >
CC: s50u at s50e.si <mailto:s50u at s50e.si> ; Kin <ea3cv at cronux.net <mailto:ea3cv at cronux.net> >
Asunto: Re: [Dxspider-support] Incorrect node configurations (II)
I'm surprised to see SM7IUN. It should not exist. My nodes are SM7IUN-1, -2, and -3.
Björn SM7IUN
On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 6:21 PM Kin via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk <mailto:dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> > wrote:
Yes Dan, but not only the -32, -2 is a user.
It would be advisable to do this:
disc IW1QLH-2
set/user IW1QLH-2
disc IW1QLH-32
set/user IW1QLH-32
as they are not nodes, it does not affect and ensures that no erroneous data will be sent to the network.
Also, there are nodes with PC9x disabled, and when they enable it, they will surely send erroneous information.
I do not understand why those who can use PC9x do not do so. And to say that it's a bandwidth problem with the speeds given by the operators ???
I advise to run:
set/wantPC9x
won't notice anything and will be visible to the rest of the network.
73 de Kin EA3CV
_______________________________________________
EA3CV-2 dxcluster.cronux.net <http://dxcluster.cronux.net> 7300
http://clustermap.cronux.net/map.html
De: Dxspider-support <dxspider-support-bounces at tobit.co.uk <mailto:dxspider-support-bounces at tobit.co.uk> > En nombre de Danilo Brelih via Dxspider-support
Enviado el: domingo, 17 de noviembre de 2024 18:10
Para: Kin via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk <mailto:dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> >
CC: Danilo Brelih <s50u at s50e.si <mailto:s50u at s50e.si> >
Asunto: Re: [Dxspider-support] Incorrect node configurations (II)
Kin via Dxspider-support je 17.11.2024 ob 14:09 napisal:
According to my knowledge IW1QLH-32 should be defined as user since it connects clusters every "x" minutes for his uptime statistics, see:
http://www.hamcluster.net/
CUL Dan S50U
Hi,
As an extension to my last message, here is a complete list of what can be
seen yesterday, but only with pc9x, if you look at the nodes that don't have
it enabled or implemented, there is even more.
The list shows 'possible' errors in the definition of the partners. But it
does not indicate which one is wrong.
origin node partner nodes
----------- ---------------------
CS5ARTD-2 SM7IUN SM7IUN-1
CS5SEL-5 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
CU3HY-2 SV5FRI SV5FRI-1
CX2SA-8 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
DB0ERF-5 F4BWT-3 F4BWT-7
EA4FIT-2 EA4FIT EA4FIT-5
GB7DJK DK7ET-4 DK7ET-5
GB7NHR EA7URG EA7URG-5
GB7NHR IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
GB7RAU IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
GB7VAX GB7DXG GB7DXG-1
GB7VAX IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
HG8PRC R5ACQ-1 R5ACQ-3
IK4ICZ-6 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-6
IK5PWJ-6 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
IK5ZUK-6 IK5PWJ-6 IK5PWJ-8
IK6IHL-6 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
IK6XMI-6 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
IK7NXU-6 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
IQ1LA-6 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-6
IQ8PQ-6 N0VD N0VD-7
IQ8RB-6 N0VD N0VD-7
IU4QTF-9 IK4ICZ IK4ICZ-6
IW1QLH-2 EA4URE-2 EA4URE-3
IW1QLH-2 SM6HOC-2 SM6HOC-6
IW1QLH-2 W1NR W1NR-9
JH1RFM-9 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-6
KF8I-3 F1FCA F1FCA-2
KF8I-3 KB8PMY KB8PMY-3
KF8I-3 W8BS W8BS-2
KY9J-2 VE2PKT VE2PKT-9
KY9J-2 VK5GR VK5GR-2
N3BSQ-1 EA4FIT EA4FIT-2
NA4DA-2 WA0O WA0O-9
NL7S HI8S HI8S-8
NX9G IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-6 IW1QLH-32
PA2SQ-1 PI1LAP PI1LAP-1
PA4JJ-1 PA4JJ-2 PA4JJ-3
PA4JJ-2 PA4JJ-1 PA4JJ-3
PA4JJ-3 PA4JJ-1 PA4JJ-2
PI1LAP-1 PI1LAP PI1LAP-2
PI4NOS-1 HB9VQQ-2 HB9VQQ-3
PY3NZ-8 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-6
PY3NZ-8 PY4OG-2 PY4OG-4
PY4OG-4 SM7IUN SM7IUN-1
PY5JO-11 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-6 IW1QLH-32
R2AKT-9 RA3ATX-8 RA3ATX-9
S50DXS IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
SK3W-6 SM7IUN-1 SM7IUN-2
SM7IUN-1 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
SR4DXC F4GVE F4GVE-2
SR4DXC PI1LAP PI1LAP-1
VE3CGR-5 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
VE3EY-7 SM7IUN-1 SM7IUN-2
VE3ZIN-2 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-6
VE6CIC-1 SV5FRI SV5FRI-1
VE6CIC-1 WB3FFV WB3FFV-2
W1DX IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
W1NR PA4JJ-2 PA4JJ-3
W6RFU N6WS-2 N6WS-6
W9TY-1 K4HNT-1 K4HNT-2
WB3FFV-2 9M2PJU-1 9M2PJU-2
WB3FFV-2 IW1QLH-2 IW1QLH-32
YO2LOJ-2 N2YO-2 N2YO-4
An example of what I mean is shown with the first one in the list:
CS5ARTD-2 SM7IUN SM7IUN-1
PC92^CS5ARTD-2^85800.02^A^^7SM7IUN:213.164.211.147^H94^
PC92^SM7IUN-1^85799.02^A^^5CS5ARTD-2:65.109.3.118^H95^
CS5ARTD-2 says it has SM7IUN connected as a node.
On the other hand, SM7IUN-1 says that the node connected to it is CS5ARTD-2.
>From the above we can conclude that one of the two nodes has its partner
configured incorrectly.
If you can look at it and fix it, it would be very positive.
Thanks for your help.
73 de Kin EA3CV
-------------------------------------
EA3CV-2 dxcluster.cronux.net <http://dxcluster.cronux.net> 7300
http://clustermap.cronux.net/map.html
_______________________________________________
Dxspider-support mailing list
Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk <mailto:Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
--
S50CLX DX Cluster <https://s50clx.infrax.si>
_______________________________________________
Dxspider-support mailing list
Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk <mailto:Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20241119/4ddad9d2/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the Dxspider-support
mailing list