[Dxspider-support] To be or not to be one of the PC9X
IZ2LSC
iz2lsc.andrea at gmail.com
Tue Sep 3 18:30:52 BST 2024
Hi Kin,
in my case, IZ2LSC-97 is an internal "pseudo" node connected to the real
node IZ2LSC-99.
It should remain internal and not advertised/visible to the rest of the
network and is not possible to connect to it from the internet.
It doesn't exchange PC9X messages.
Andrea
iz2lsc
-->
Il giorno lun 2 set 2024 alle ore 19:15 Kin via Dxspider-support <
dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> ha scritto:
> Hi,
>
> I'm analyzing myself with the sentences used by our nodes and the traffic
> generated, specifically with PC92.
> Of the 416 nodes I see in my console: 93 have PC9X OFF, including some
> DXSpider (DK7ET-5, JG1YGH-15, NR1X-3)
> Of these 93, there are quite a few that do not send a single PC92 sentence,
> but they seem to be nodes, very strange, no?
> Some possibly because their software does not implement it (bad in 2024)
> and
> others because they have disabled it (worse).
> The question that arises for me is: If most nodes do not use a common
> protocol (partial perhaps), do we have the guarantee that the Network will
> not fail?
> Why do sysops disable the use of PC9X?
>
> 9M2PJU-1 5401 No No
> AE5E 5401 No No
> AI9T 5000 No Yes
> DB0ERF 5401 No Yes
> DF7GB-2 5000 No Yes
> DK7ET-5 5455 No Yes
> DL2ND-10 5401 No No
> DL2ND-8 5000 No Yes
> DL9GTB-1 5000 No Yes
> DL9GTB-2 5401 No No
> DU3TW-1 5401 No No
> EA1DX 5401 No No
> EA2CW-1 5401 No No
> EA8URL-5 5401 No No
> F4GVE 5401 No No
> GB7DXG 5401 No No
> GB7DXS 5401 No No
> HA2NA-1 5401 No No
> HA8TKS-9 5401 No No
> HI8S 5401 No No
> IK2XDE-6 5401 No No
> IW0QNL-6 5499 No Yes
> IW1QLH-2 5401 No No
> IZ2LSC-97 5401 No No
> JA2YYF 5401 No No
> JA2YYF-9 5910 No Yes
> JA4PXC-11 5431 No Yes
> JA4PXC-7 5401 No No
> JA4PXC-9 5401 No No
> JG1VGX-7 5401 No No
> JG1VGX-8 5401 No No
> JG1YGH-15 5457 No Yes
> K0XM-5 5401 No No
> K1EU 5000 No Yes
> K1TTT 5910 No Yes
> K1TTT-1 5401 No No
> K2CAN 5401 No No
> K3LR 5401 No No
> K4HNT-1 5401 No Yes
> K5DX 5401 No No
> K9AJ 5401 No No
> K9LC 5401 No No
> KK6JA-7 5401 No No
> KM3T-5 5000 No Yes
> KN4F 5401 No No
> KQ8M 5401 No No
> LA3C-6 5401 No No
> LA7Q-6 5000 No Yes
> LY4I 5401 No No
> LZ7A 5401 No No
> M0IPU-8 5000 No Yes
> N2WQ-1 3397 No Yes
> N2YO-4 5401 No No
> N4ZKF-1 5401 No No
> NC7J 5401 No No
> NC7J-7 5401 No No
> NG9R 5000 No Yes
> NR1X-3 5455 No Yes
> NX9G-6 5401 No No
> OK2CQR-5 5401 No No
> ON0DXK-5 5401 No No
> ON0LLV-6 5401 No No
> ON4KST 5000 No Yes
> OP0P 5000 No Yes
> PY1TSB-1 5401 No No
> PY5JO-1 5401 No No
> S50ARX 5000 No Yes
> SK1MMR 5401 No No
> SM7IUN 5401 No No
> SM7IUN-2 5401 No No
> SV5FRI 5401 No No
> US4MFB-15 5000 No Yes
> UT1U 5401 No No
> VA3UG 5401 No Yes
> VA6AAA-1 5401 No No
> VE7CC 5000 No Yes
> VK5GR 5401 No Yes
> W3GQ 5401 No No
> W3LPL 5499 No Yes
> W3LPL-1 5401 No No
> W3RGA-1 5401 No No
> W4DXA 5401 No No
> W4MYA 5401 No No
> W4NJA 5401 No No
> W7JD-1 5401 No No
> W9ODD-1 5401 No No
> W9PA-4 5401 No No
> W9YB 5499 No Yes
> WB4QOJ-8 5401 No No
> WC2L 5401 No No
> WD1L 5401 No No
> WD4IXD 5000 No Yes
> ZS2EZ-3 5401 No No
>
> Regards,
>
> Kin EA3CV
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20240903/70946170/attachment.htm>
More information about the Dxspider-support
mailing list