[Dxspider-support] The results are in for today (so far)

[HB9DHG Fulvio]

This will create a list of nodes with the highest percentage of 'Bad
spots', sorted by descending percentage."

grepdbg 'bad spot ' | awk '{ $1=substr($1,1,9); $2=""; line=$0; if
(!seen[line]++) { total++; match($0, /not on node ([^ ]+)/, arr); if
(arr[1] != "") node_counts[arr[1]]++ } } END { printf "Bad spots:
%.0f%%\n", total; for (node in node_counts) printf "%s, %.2f%%\n", node,
(node_counts[node] / total) * 100 }' | sort -k2,2nr -k1,1 | sed 's/,,/,/'

At the end, the total Badspots ;)

73 de HB9DHG Fulvio

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 6:07 PM HB9DHG Fulvio <hb9dhg at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks Kin,
>
> My mistake, and thanks! Now, in the logs, I'm starting to see several "bad
> spots."
>
> 73 de HB9DHG Fulvio
>
> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 5:42 PM Kin <ea3cv at cronux.net> wrote:
>
>> Maybe you did not activate the variable:
>>
>>
>>
>> set/var $DXProt::senderverify = 2
>>
>>
>>
>> Kin
>>
>>
>>
>> *De:* HB9DHG Fulvio <hb9dhg at gmail.com>
>> *Enviado el:* miércoles, 12 de febrero de 2025 17:36
>> *Para:* The DXSpider Support list <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
>> *CC:* Kin <ea3cv at cronux.net>
>> *Asunto:* Re: [Dxspider-support] The results are in for today (so far)
>>
>>
>>
>> 0
>> $ grepdbg 'bad spot ' | awk '{ $1=substr($1,1,9); $2=""; line=$0; if
>> (!seen[line]++) print line }' | wc -l
>> 0
>> $
>>
>>
>>
>> What am I doing wrong?
>>
>>
>>
>> HB9DHG Fulvio
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 5:30 PM Kin via Dxspider-support <
>> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>> For those of you who are eager to try it out, you can do the following:
>>
>>
>>
>> ./grepdbg '\s+<-\s+I\s+EA3CV-3\s+PC61' | wc -l
>>
>> ./grepdbg 'bad spot ' | awk '{ $1=substr($1,1,9); $2=""; line=$0; if (!
>> seen[line]++) print line }' | wc -l
>>
>>
>>
>> In my case 63.59%
>>
>>
>>
>> Kin EA3CV
>>
>>
>>
>> *De:* Dxspider-support <dxspider-support-bounces at tobit.co.uk> *En nombre
>> de *Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support
>> *Enviado el:* miércoles, 12 de febrero de 2025 16:34
>> *Para:* Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
>> *CC:* Dirk Koopman <djk at tobit.co.uk>
>> *Asunto:* Re: [Dxspider-support] The results are in for today (so far)
>>
>>
>>
>> On 12/02/2025 15:20, Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support wrote:
>>
>>
>> Or to put it another way, most of the traffic sent today is very likely
>> fake.
>>
>> Houston, we have a problem...
>>
>> 73 Dirk G1TLH
>>
>> PS If you have had senderverify set > 0 for all of today, you can repeat
>> the example above by changing 'GB7DJK' to a similar node feeding yours from
>> which you are likely to get all/most of your spots.
>>
>>
>> I'm sorry to say that you will have to wait until the next release to do
>> this test yourselves. You can set $DXProt::sendverify > 0, and it will do
>> the job, but the debug data will be too noisy to get similar numbers. I am
>> on my "test" branch which puts this check in the correct place, so that you
>> get just the one error message per spot instead of one for *every* PC61.
>>
>> Sorry pardon
>>
>> Dirk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20250212/8a6d57f6/attachment-0001.htm>