[Dxspider-support] Here we are again (huge flooding)

[Dirk Koopman]

To be fair. He is trying to defend himself from DXSpider nodes that have 
not (yet) stopped sending IP addresses in their PC92 C records, because 
his software does not have the buffer space to handle a huge PC92 C 
record from nodes with 500+ users - if that PC92 C has IP addresses as 
well. Especially if a large number of those IP addresses are huge IPV6 
ones.

*DO THIS NOW:

set/var $DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enabled 0*

And make sure that that command is commented out in your 
/spider/scripts/startup file.

As it happens, whenever I looked, during this weekend VE7CC-1 had been 
sending PC92 A D and C records. Probably to his detriment.

73 Dirk G1TLH

On 17/02/2025 12:20, Mike McCarthy, W1NR via Dxspider-support wrote:
> All spots from VE7CC-1 were dumped when senderverify=2 since he 
> doesn't broadcast users. He has near 1000 users so the number of 
> legitimate spots was significant.
>
> On 2/17/2025 5:09 AM, IZ2LSC via Dxspider-support wrote:
>> Kin,
>> how many legitimate spots is senderverify=2 discarding during normal 
>> conditions?
>> I understood this is still work in progress as from Dirk email he got 
>> 60% of spots dropped. This is not fine:
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20250217/38f00265/attachment.htm>