[Dxspider-support] Some information

[IZ2LSC]

I collected the % of unverified spots received by my node in 24 hrs during
a normal "peaceful" working day.
This is the result.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wSCPqdDAu4wF0_syKZkzArgCDZ-gxBFK/view?usp=sharing

So if we really decide to drop unverified spots (that most of the time are
real spots, not fake or forged) we are going to drop a lot of spots.
I can understand this as a countermeasure during an attack.....but not
during normal operations.
Just a consideration about the side effects.

73
Andrea, iz2lsc


-->


On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 8:07 PM Kin via Dxspider-support <
dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have been analysing how a CC Cluster node behaves with pc9x supposedly
> enabled, to see the suspect filtering.
>
> The only thing that seems to work correctly is PC92K, which only reports
> the
> node itself.
> The PC92A does not show all user connections and none from a partner.
> The PC92D does not show all user disconnections.
> The PC92C is not generated.
> I don't understand the point of generating some PC92s and not all of them.
> I think it would be better not to generate any if you can't generate them
> all. This would avoid ambiguities in the network.
>
> It is clear that with incomplete information, a CC Cluster will be greatly
> affected by filtering. But the vast majority (if not all - 1) do not use
> PC92 like ARC, DXNet and AK1A, all their users' spots will be flagged as
> suspicious.
>
> Have a nice weekend.
>
> Kin EA3CV
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20250222/d1b0d98c/attachment.htm>