[Dxspider-support] Some information

Keith, G6NHU g6nhu at me.com
Sat Feb 22 16:43:28 GMT 2025 

No idea, Anthony - You’re definitely not blocked here.

On 22 Feb 2025 at 16:05 +0000, Anthony \(N2KI\) via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>, wrote:
> He must have me blocked. I will search for an alternate partner.
>
> Anthony
>   N2KI
>
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2025, 10:58 ken Sharman <kenny at g7vja.co.uk> wrote:
> >  Hi Anthony
> > Link working here ok,
> >  G6NHU-2 DXSP 18-Feb-2025 0405Z   4d 11h 49m   0.09   2    300   260
> >
> > Ken G7VJA
> > GB7HTL
> > > On 02/22/2025 3:32 PM GMT Anthony (N2KI) via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Has your connection info changed?
> > > Connection starts but it never gets to connect.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Anthony
> > >    N2KI
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 8:50 AM Keith, G6NHU via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > Nope, it’s up.
> > > > >
> > > > > 73 Keith G6NHU
> > > > > On 22 Feb 2025 at 13:32 +0000, Anthony (N2KI) via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>, wrote:
> > > > > > Keith,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Is G6HNU-2 down?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Anthony
> > > > > >    N2KI
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 5:11 AM Keith, G6NHU via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > > > > I’m seeing spots coming in via nodes running build 568 that are being flagged as bad.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > As build 568 now has $DXProt::sendverify set to 2 by default, does that mean that the sysops have added an entry to startup that sets this back to 0?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > If we’re going to take steps to secure the network and the data we pass, this sort of thing should be hard-coded!
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > 73 Keith G6NHU
> > > > > > > > On 22 Feb 2025 at 09:01 +0000, Kin via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>, wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Perhaps we should display a list of the nodes and the number of spots that have been flagged as suspicious.
> > > > > > > > > It is possible that a sysop could take steps to correct this.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Kin
> > > > > > > > > EA3CV
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Enviado desde Outlook para Android
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > De: IZ2LSC <iz2lsc.andrea at gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > Enviado el: sábado, 22 de febrero de 2025 9:44
> > > > > > > > > Para: The DXSpider Support list <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
> > > > > > > > > CC: Kin <ea3cv at cronux.net>
> > > > > > > > > Asunto: Re: [Dxspider-support] Some information
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I collected the % of unverified spots received by my node in 24 hrs during a normal "peaceful" working day.
> > > > > > > > > This is the result.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wSCPqdDAu4wF0_syKZkzArgCDZ-gxBFK/view?usp=sharing
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > So if we really decide to drop unverified spots (that most of the time are real spots, not fake or forged) we are going to drop a lot of spots.
> > > > > > > > > I can understand this as a countermeasure during an attack.....but not during normal operations.
> > > > > > > > > Just a consideration about the side effects.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > 73
> > > > > > > > > Andrea, iz2lsc
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > -->
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 8:07 PM Kin via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > Hi,
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > I have been analysing how a CC Cluster node behaves with pc9x supposedly
> > > > > > > > > > enabled, to see the suspect filtering.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > The only thing that seems to work correctly is PC92K, which only reports the
> > > > > > > > > > node itself.
> > > > > > > > > > The PC92A does not show all user connections and none from a partner.
> > > > > > > > > > The PC92D does not show all user disconnections.
> > > > > > > > > > The PC92C is not generated.
> > > > > > > > > > I don't understand the point of generating some PC92s and not all of them.
> > > > > > > > > > I think it would be better not to generate any if you can't generate them
> > > > > > > > > > all. This would avoid ambiguities in the network.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > It is clear that with incomplete information, a CC Cluster will be greatly
> > > > > > > > > > affected by filtering. But the vast majority (if not all - 1) do not use
> > > > > > > > > > PC92 like ARC, DXNet and AK1A, all their users' spots will be flagged as
> > > > > > > > > > suspicious.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Have a nice weekend.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Kin EA3CV
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > > Dxspider-support mailing list
> > > > > > > > > > Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> > > > > > > > > > https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > > Dxspider-support mailing list
> > > > > > > > > Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> > > > > > > > > https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
> > > > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > > > Dxspider-support mailing list
> > > > > > > > Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> > > > > > > > https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
> > > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > > Dxspider-support mailing list
> > > > > > Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> > > > > > https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Dxspider-support mailing list
> > > > > Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> > > > > https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Dxspider-support mailing list
> > > Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> > > https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20250222/7d25adfe/attachment-0001.htm>

More information about the Dxspider-support mailing list