[Dxspider-support] Network degradation

[Rudy Bakalov]

Yes, indeed, a crescendo. Strong words, accusations, assumptions of bad intent solely based on logs. Have you contacted any of these stations to understand what’s happening?

I personally think it’s irresponsible to draw these conclusions without taking the time to learn. Logs can fool people into thinking they understand.

Then there is the end user perspective- have they raised a concern that the spots from these Polish stations are bad and should be dropped?

Do you understand how the spots actually originate without being logged to a cluster?

There is a lot of accusations based on logs.

Rudy N2WQ

Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorrect.


> On Feb 27, 2025, at 2:22 AM, Kin via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> After looking at yesterday's logs, it is again evident that all roads lead
> to Rome.
> Without digging too deep, you can clearly see that stations like the
> following:
> 
> SN100IARU
> HF100IARU
> SP100IARU
> IR0RRAI
> HF95PZK
> 
> have the same behaviour: spoofing of the source node and IP.
> 
> It is true that Dirk's algorithm is working very well, but I think we should
> start taking stronger measures. If a certain SES station is involved by the
> methodology we already know, it should be blocked. It is possible that they
> will take measures to prevent it.
> 
> This is going 'in crescendo'. It is becoming more and more necessary to go
> to password-protected nodes for users and nodes in spot/ann transmissions,
> excluding completely those that are not trustworthy.
> 
> Kin EA3CV
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support