[Dxspider-support] Network degradation

[Rudy Bakalov]

These are really big words that need support rather than speculations and emotions.

Who outside of this reflector is complaining? What is their pain point?

What makes a spot legitimate beyond the obvious call and frequency accuracy? Does the world share and understand your definition of? Or you assume they do?

Flooded? What percentage of overall traffic are the alleged fraudulent spots?

Fraudulent? What makes these spots fraudulent beyond not meeting your expectations for their origin? Who’s been defrauded?

A lot of accusations solely based on logs, no interactions with end users or the alleged bad guys.

Rudy N2WQ

Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorrect.


> On Feb 27, 2025, at 6:49 AM, Keith, G6NHU via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
> 
> We all want the same thing, we want to give our users good, reliable, trusted spots, they want to provide spots for their users.  Let’s get it sorted so they can do it legitimately without flooding the network with fraudulently injected spots.
> 
> 73 Keith G6NHU