[Dxspider-support] Webclusters, the second

[Keith, G6NHU]

I don’t see why anyone would complain about option 2.

73 Keith
On 10 Mar 2025 at 00:36 +0000, Gregor Surmann via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>, wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I am running a big web cluster, too. I have the following options:
>
>
> 1. Spot "by" and "ip" (current solution), having spots rejected because of
> verify. Nodes will drop the spots and someone here will complain ;)
>
> 2. Login every user to my node (previous solution), having many spotters
> with the same IP (of the web server). Someone here will complain ;)
>
> 3. Fake the whole login and spot process with a fake node, fake PC messages
> etc. This could work, but why should I take this path?
>
> 4. Whatever different solution appears...
>
>
> 73 de Gregor, DO5SSB
>
> --
> | Gregor 'SinusPL' Surmann | gs at funil.de | Will work for bandwidth |
> |--------------------------------------------------------------------------|
> | The UNIX Guru`s view of Sex: | www.sinuspl.net |
> | unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; umount; sleep |
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20250310/11d76cf1/attachment.htm>