[Dxspider-support] Forgeries

[Christopher Schlegel]

Nevermind. Theory, was not well thought out and I keep hitting roadblocks...

Chris, WI3W

On Mon, Mar 10, 2025, 10:06 Christopher Schlegel <sutehk.cs at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Dirk,
>
> How hard would it be to implement a hashed check into the PC92 protocol.
> I.e. I log into WI3W-2, receive a randomly generated number/string used to
> verify tx/rx between the user and node. Kind of like pub/priv keys but only
> to generate the check. As long as the check is valid keep the connection,
> if not, boot it.
>
> Or, something similar. Spot validation? I'd expect CPU processing to tick
> up a little, but most machines in use should not choke.
>
> 73,
>
> Chris, WI3W
>
> On Mon, Mar 10, 2025, 09:45 Mike McCarthy, W1NR via Dxspider-support <
> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> A small number of nodes, yes, but with about 1/4 of the total users of
>> the global cluster network. VE7CC-1 alone has over 800 on any given day.
>>
>> On 3/10/2025 8:29 AM, Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support wrote:
>>
>> > Which means that input from the CCluster/ARCluster system would
>> > disappear as they are still using the same protocol as we are and
>> > therefore just as untrusted as anyone else. Their big advantage is that
>> > there are a relatively small group of nodes with an author (or other
>>
>> --
>> 73 de Mike, W1NR
>>
>> THAT was the equation. EXISTENCE!... SURVIVAL... must cancel out...
>> programming!
>>
>> - Ruk -
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20250310/592343ec/attachment.htm>