<html><body><div dir="auto">Hi Andrea, </div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">The important thing is to make sure that the node you use is defined as a user and not as a node. Then it won't be seen as just another member of the network.<br></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">73 de Kin</div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container" dir="auto"><br><hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%"><div id="divRplyFwdMsg" style="font-size: 11pt;"><strong>De:</strong> IZ2LSC <iz2lsc.andrea@gmail.com><br><strong>Enviado:</strong> martes, septiembre 3, 2024 7:31:06 p. m.<br><strong>Para:</strong> The DXSpider Support list <dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk><br><strong>CC:</strong> Kin <ea3cv@cronux.net><br><strong>Asunto:</strong> Re: [Dxspider-support] To be or not to be one of the PC9X<br></div><br><div dir="ltr">Hi Kin, <div>in my case, IZ2LSC-97 is an internal "pseudo" node connected to the real node IZ2LSC-99.</div><div>It should remain internal and not advertised/visible to the rest of the network and is not possible to connect to it from the internet. </div><div>It doesn't exchange PC9X messages.</div><div><br></div><div>Andrea</div><div>iz2lsc</div><div><br clear="all"><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">--></div></div><br></div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">Il giorno lun 2 set 2024 alle ore 19:15 Kin via Dxspider-support <<a href="mailto:dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk">dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a>> ha scritto:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204); padding-left:1ex">Hi,<br>
<br>
I'm analyzing myself with the sentences used by our nodes and the traffic<br>
generated, specifically with PC92.<br>
Of the 416 nodes I see in my console: 93 have PC9X OFF, including some<br>
DXSpider (DK7ET-5, JG1YGH-15, NR1X-3)<br>
Of these 93, there are quite a few that do not send a single PC92 sentence,<br>
but they seem to be nodes, very strange, no?<br>
Some possibly because their software does not implement it (bad in 2024) and<br>
others because they have disabled it (worse).<br>
The question that arises for me is: If most nodes do not use a common<br>
protocol (partial perhaps), do we have the guarantee that the Network will<br>
not fail?<br>
Why do sysops disable the use of PC9X?<br>
<br>
9M2PJU-1 5401 No No<br>
AE5E 5401 No No<br>
AI9T 5000 No Yes<br>
DB0ERF 5401 No Yes<br>
DF7GB-2 5000 No Yes<br>
DK7ET-5 5455 No Yes<br>
DL2ND-10 5401 No No<br>
DL2ND-8 5000 No Yes<br>
DL9GTB-1 5000 No Yes<br>
DL9GTB-2 5401 No No<br>
DU3TW-1 5401 No No<br>
EA1DX 5401 No No<br>
EA2CW-1 5401 No No<br>
EA8URL-5 5401 No No<br>
F4GVE 5401 No No<br>
GB7DXG 5401 No No<br>
GB7DXS 5401 No No<br>
HA2NA-1 5401 No No<br>
HA8TKS-9 5401 No No<br>
HI8S 5401 No No<br>
IK2XDE-6 5401 No No<br>
IW0QNL-6 5499 No Yes<br>
IW1QLH-2 5401 No No<br>
IZ2LSC-97 5401 No No<br>
JA2YYF 5401 No No<br>
JA2YYF-9 5910 No Yes<br>
JA4PXC-11 5431 No Yes<br>
JA4PXC-7 5401 No No<br>
JA4PXC-9 5401 No No<br>
JG1VGX-7 5401 No No<br>
JG1VGX-8 5401 No No<br>
JG1YGH-15 5457 No Yes<br>
K0XM-5 5401 No No<br>
K1EU 5000 No Yes<br>
K1TTT 5910 No Yes<br>
K1TTT-1 5401 No No<br>
K2CAN 5401 No No<br>
K3LR 5401 No No<br>
K4HNT-1 5401 No Yes<br>
K5DX 5401 No No<br>
K9AJ 5401 No No<br>
K9LC 5401 No No<br>
KK6JA-7 5401 No No<br>
KM3T-5 5000 No Yes<br>
KN4F 5401 No No<br>
KQ8M 5401 No No<br>
LA3C-6 5401 No No<br>
LA7Q-6 5000 No Yes<br>
LY4I 5401 No No<br>
LZ7A 5401 No No<br>
M0IPU-8 5000 No Yes<br>
N2WQ-1 3397 No Yes<br>
N2YO-4 5401 No No<br>
N4ZKF-1 5401 No No<br>
NC7J 5401 No No<br>
NC7J-7 5401 No No<br>
NG9R 5000 No Yes<br>
NR1X-3 5455 No Yes<br>
NX9G-6 5401 No No<br>
OK2CQR-5 5401 No No<br>
ON0DXK-5 5401 No No<br>
ON0LLV-6 5401 No No<br>
ON4KST 5000 No Yes<br>
OP0P 5000 No Yes<br>
PY1TSB-1 5401 No No<br>
PY5JO-1 5401 No No<br>
S50ARX 5000 No Yes<br>
SK1MMR 5401 No No<br>
SM7IUN 5401 No No<br>
SM7IUN-2 5401 No No<br>
SV5FRI 5401 No No<br>
US4MFB-15 5000 No Yes<br>
UT1U 5401 No No<br>
VA3UG 5401 No Yes<br>
VA6AAA-1 5401 No No<br>
VE7CC 5000 No Yes<br>
VK5GR 5401 No Yes<br>
W3GQ 5401 No No<br>
W3LPL 5499 No Yes<br>
W3LPL-1 5401 No No<br>
W3RGA-1 5401 No No<br>
W4DXA 5401 No No<br>
W4MYA 5401 No No<br>
W4NJA 5401 No No<br>
W7JD-1 5401 No No<br>
W9ODD-1 5401 No No<br>
W9PA-4 5401 No No<br>
W9YB 5499 No Yes<br>
WB4QOJ-8 5401 No No<br>
WC2L 5401 No No<br>
WD1L 5401 No No<br>
WD4IXD 5000 No Yes<br>
ZS2EZ-3 5401 No No<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
<br>
Kin EA3CV<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Dxspider-support mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk">Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support" rel="noreferrer">https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support</a><br>
</blockquote></div>
<br></div></body></html>