<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<p>Hi Kin, <br>
</p>
<p>All good points, so you could set up nodes with multiple
callsigns, and use rsync to only share what can be shared. Not an
ideal solution but there are possibilities.</p>
<p>Mind you , from a users perspective, its real easy to switch
between nodes so I really think load balancing is not something we
really need to worry about.🙂</p>
<p>cheers</p>
<p>Tim</p>
<p><br>
</p>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 15/10/24 16:29, Kin EA3CV wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:2D353EE4-363C-784B-A7B2-1BEFB9B228E0@hxcore.ol">
<meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
<div dir="auto">It's not that simple, Tim.</div>
<div dir="auto">There should never be more than one node connected
to the same callsign.</div>
<div dir="auto">Another problem is that the nodes do not share the
user_json DB.</div>
<div dir="auto">Additionally, there are settings such as filters
that should be shared.</div>
<div dir="auto">And partners cannot be shared either, although
this has an easy solution.</div>
<div dir="auto">Using HA Proxy would be a great solution if you
didn't have to modify the spider code. </div>
<div dir="auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir="auto">73 de Kin EA3CV<br>
</div>
<div id="mail-editor-reference-message-container" dir="auto"><br>
<hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" style="font-size: 11pt;"><strong>De:</strong>
Dxspider-support <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dxspider-support-bounces@tobit.co.uk"><dxspider-support-bounces@tobit.co.uk></a>
en nombre de Tim Tuck via Dxspider-support
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk"><dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk></a><br>
<strong>Enviado:</strong> lunes, octubre 14, 2024 10:48:19
p. m.<br>
<strong>Para:</strong> Faizul via Dxspider-support
<a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk"><dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk></a><br>
<strong>CC:</strong> Tim Tuck <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:vk2xax@skybase.net"><vk2xax@skybase.net></a><br>
<strong>Asunto:</strong> Re: [Dxspider-support] Load Balancing<br>
</div>
<br>
Hi Faizul,<br>
<br>
Given the interconnected nature of the dxcluster all spots
appear <br>
everywhere almost instantaneously so you could just connect to
another <br>
node if your favourite node went down and I don't think any node
is <br>
suffering for excess load since the software is reasonably
lightweight.<br>
<br>
You could set up two nodes locally with DNS round robin load
balancing <br>
between them or you could put a HA-proxy in front of them to do
the load <br>
balancing. Both methodologies expand horizontally to many nodes.
This <br>
can give you both load sharing and redundancy should you require
it.<br>
<br>
There's really no need to have the software itself do that
function.<br>
<br>
cheers<br>
<br>
Tim<br>
<br>
On 15/10/24 07:24, Faizul via Dxspider-support wrote:<br>
> Hello OM.<br>
><br>
> Is there any future plan to do load balancing for dx spider
network?<br>
><br>
-- <br>
VK2XAX : QF68KM : ITU59 : CQ30 : ORARC : WIA<br>
<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Dxspider-support mailing list<br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk">Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a><br>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support">https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support</a><br>
<br>
</div>
</blockquote>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
VK2XAX : QF68KM : ITU59 : CQ30 : ORARC : WIA</pre>
</body>
</html>