<div dir="ltr"><div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">DIrk,</div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif"><br></div><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif">I have commented the line out over here and also set it to 0 as requested.</div><br clear="all"></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"> <br><b>Regards,<br><br>Anthony </b><div><b> N2KI</b><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br></div></div></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:42 AM Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support <<a href="mailto:dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk">dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><u></u>
<div>
<div>I think CCCluster is can be configured
to use PC92 C (maybe A & D as well) - meaning either
read/process/write PC92 C or not at all. My failure to remember
his buffering problems caused a knee jerk reaction to enable ip
addresses in PC92 C. Needless to say, I suspect, he has moved to
protect himself. And can (or should) blame him.<br>
<br>
So in the spirit of trying to be cooperative would all DXSpider
nodes that have <br>
<br>
<pre>set/var $<a>DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable</a> 1</pre>
<br>
in their /spider/scripts/startup - PLEASE comment it out.<br>
<br>
And then, in the local console type:<br>
<br>
<pre>set/var $<a>DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable</a> 0</pre>
<br>
to disable it in the current node instance.<br>
<br>
Thank you in advance<br>
<br>
73 Dirk G1TLH<br>
<br>
On 13/02/2025 14:21, Kin wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite">
<pre>Dirk,
If Lee is not using the PC92Cs, why disable them? I guess he will throw them away if he uses them. He only sends A and D.
Kin
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Dxspider-support <a href="mailto:dxspider-support-bounces@tobit.co.uk" target="_blank"><dxspider-support-bounces@tobit.co.uk></a> En nombre de Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support
Enviado el: jueves, 13 de febrero de 2025 15:03
Para: Kin via Dxspider-support <a href="mailto:dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk" target="_blank"><dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk></a>
CC: Dirk Koopman <a href="mailto:djk@tobit.co.uk" target="_blank"><djk@tobit.co.uk></a>
Asunto: Re: [Dxspider-support] The results are in for today (so far)
Lee VE7CC-1 seems to have disabled PC92 C records.
Now, in the dim and distant past I think I recall Lee saying that he cannot handle PC92 C records with user/IP addresses from large nodes like WA9PIE-2 with > ~800 users regular users. This is why, I think, the $<a>DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable</a> parameter was set to 0 by default (it was 1 originally). These records (with [especially IPV6] addresses get very large. Not a problem for perl programs but for compiled languages like Visual Basic it is.
In light of this, please set $<a>DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable</a> back to 0 if you have it set 1. Whilst it is useful to have the IP address in the
PC92 C record but this information is also accumulated, over time, in
PC92 A records in the user file.
Also, if you find yourselves in the situation where you are not getting
PC92 records from VE7CC-1 then disconnect him and the problem should resolve.
NOTE: sender verify will only occur with nodes that have sent at least 1
PC92 C record.
If a node can send a PC92 C, but has not yet done so, or your node has just restarted and has not got one yet, then no sender verification is done.
73 Dirk G1TLH
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>
Dxspider-support mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk" target="_blank">Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support</a><br>
</blockquote></div>