<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I think CCCluster is can be configured
to use PC92 C (maybe A & D as well) - meaning either
read/process/write PC92 C or not at all. My failure to remember
his buffering problems caused a knee jerk reaction to enable ip
addresses in PC92 C. Needless to say, I suspect, he has moved to
protect himself. And can (or should) blame him.<br>
<br>
So in the spirit of trying to be cooperative would all DXSpider
nodes that have <br>
<br>
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">set/var $<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable">DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable</a> 1</pre>
<br>
in their /spider/scripts/startup - PLEASE comment it out.<br>
<br>
And then, in the local console type:<br>
<br>
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">set/var $<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable">DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable</a> 0</pre>
<br>
to disable it in the current node instance.<br>
<br>
Thank you in advance<br>
<br>
73 Dirk G1TLH<br>
<br>
On 13/02/2025 14:21, Kin wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:028701db7e22$8b837e40$a28a7ac0$@cronux.net">
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">Dirk,
If Lee is not using the PC92Cs, why disable them? I guess he will throw them away if he uses them. He only sends A and D.
Kin
-----Mensaje original-----
De: Dxspider-support <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dxspider-support-bounces@tobit.co.uk"><dxspider-support-bounces@tobit.co.uk></a> En nombre de Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support
Enviado el: jueves, 13 de febrero de 2025 15:03
Para: Kin via Dxspider-support <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk"><dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk></a>
CC: Dirk Koopman <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:djk@tobit.co.uk"><djk@tobit.co.uk></a>
Asunto: Re: [Dxspider-support] The results are in for today (so far)
Lee VE7CC-1 seems to have disabled PC92 C records.
Now, in the dim and distant past I think I recall Lee saying that he cannot handle PC92 C records with user/IP addresses from large nodes like WA9PIE-2 with > ~800 users regular users. This is why, I think, the $<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable">DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable</a> parameter was set to 0 by default (it was 1 originally). These records (with [especially IPV6] addresses get very large. Not a problem for perl programs but for compiled languages like Visual Basic it is.
In light of this, please set $<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable">DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable</a> back to 0 if you have it set 1. Whilst it is useful to have the IP address in the
PC92 C record but this information is also accumulated, over time, in
PC92 A records in the user file.
Also, if you find yourselves in the situation where you are not getting
PC92 records from VE7CC-1 then disconnect him and the problem should resolve.
NOTE: sender verify will only occur with nodes that have sent at least 1
PC92 C record.
If a node can send a PC92 C, but has not yet done so, or your node has just restarted and has not got one yet, then no sender verification is done.
73 Dirk G1TLH
</pre>
</blockquote>
</body>
</html>