<html><body><div style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;" dir="auto">From what little I have been able to see from my mobile, there is impersonation of the origin node. There are spots that have not left my node because it has logging enabled, and I think they cannot be filtered by the duplicate algorithm. Keith has defined it very well.<br>It will be difficult to stop these attacks if we are not even able to be updated and with authenticated links, the logging thing is better not to mention it.<br></div><div style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;" dir="auto"><br></div><div style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;" dir="auto">Kin</div><div id="ms-outlook-mobile-signature" dir="auto" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_MSFontService, -apple-system, Roboto, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt;"><div><br></div>Enviado desde <a href="https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg">Outlook para Android</a></div><div dir="auto" id="mail-editor-reference-message-container"><br><hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%"><div id="divRplyFwdMsg" style="font-size: 11pt;"><strong>De:</strong> Dxspider-support <dxspider-support-bounces@tobit.co.uk> en nombre de Keith, G6NHU via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk><br><strong>Enviado:</strong> domingo, febrero 16, 2025 6:54:37 p. m.<br><strong>Para:</strong> The DXSpider Support list <dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk><br><strong>CC:</strong> Keith, G6NHU <g6nhu@me.com><br><strong>Asunto:</strong> Re: [Dxspider-support] Here we are again (huge flooding)<br></div><br>
<div name="messageBodySection" dir="auto">
<div dir="auto"><span style="font-size:16px">I don’t think any self spotting changes have made any difference to this.</span><span style="font-size:16px"><br></span><span style="font-size:16px"><br></span><span style="font-size:16px">The spots were all dumped from different (although similar callsigns) with different frequencies and different comments at the same time so they were all effectively unique spots. I assume the @[callsign] towards the end is the spoofed node they were allegedly uploaded to. </span><span style="font-size:16px"><br></span><span style="font-size:16px"><br></span><span style="font-size:medium">They may have looked like dupes at a glance but they weren’t duplicates.</span><span style="font-size:medium"><br></span><span style="font-size:medium"><br></span><span style="font-size:16px">Here’s a single example, there were many more like this.</span><span style="font-size:16px"><br></span><span style="font-size:16px"><br></span><span style="font-size:16px">73 Keith.</span><span style="font-size:16px"><br></span><span style="font-size:16px"><br></span></div></div><div name="messageReplySection" dir="auto"><blockquote type="cite" style="border-left-color:grey; border-left-width:thin; border-left-style:solid; margin:5px 5px; padding-left:10px"><div dir="auto"><br></div></blockquote>
</div>
<br></div></body></html>