<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EstiloCorreo17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 3.0cm 70.85pt 3.0cm;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=ES-UY link=blue vlink=purple>
<div class=Section1>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Dear colleagues:<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>I have updated DXSpider to v1.57 build 568
both CX2SA-6 (Test node) and CX2SA-8<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>I have activated in the test node:
$DXProt::senderverify = '2'<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>I do not have activated in CX2SA-8
$DXProt::senderverify = '2'<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>However, I see some rejections that come
from IPs that would apparently be in accordance with the country of the station
that sends the spots.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>(*) PCPROT: Bad Spot IN3KXV on 21140.0 by
OZ2B(87.49.44.51)@AE5E User OZ2B not on node AE5E, DUMPED via CX2SA-8 96 hops<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>(*) PCPROT: Bad Spot DL2025E on 18075.0 by
K0TF(173.49.106.206)@K1TTT User K0TF not on node K1TTT, DUMPED via CX2SA-8 95
hops<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>(*) PCPROT: Bad Spot VU2XO on 28390.0 by
F4ELC(90.109.186.48)@EA4RCH-5 User F4ELC not on node EA4RCH-5, DUMPED via
CX2SA-8 27 hops<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>(*) PCPROT: Bad Spot VK4/TF1OL on 10137.1
by KB8OTK(73.183.25.49)@AE5E User KB8OTK not on node AE5E, DUMPED via CX2SA-8
96 hops<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>(*) PCPROT: Bad Spot 5N9DTG on 28090.0 by
ON7KEC(213.219.156.205)@EA4RCH-5 User ON7KEC not on node EA4RCH-5, DUMPED via
CX2SA-8 27 hops<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>(*) PCPROT: Bad Spot OM0FL on 21140.0 by
OZ2B(87.49.44.51)@AE5E User OZ2B not on node AE5E, DUMPED via CX2SA-8 96 hops<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>(*) PCPROT: Bad Spot IQ6KX on 14184.0 by
IK8NRQ(101.56.146.135)@EA4RCH-5 User IK8NRQ not on node EA4RCH-5, DUMPED via
CX2SA-8 27 hops<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>(*) PCPROT: Bad Spot ON6SAT on 21140.0 by
OZ2B(87.49.44.51)@AE5E User OZ2B not on node AE5E, DUMPED via CX2SA-8 96 hops<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>What is recommended?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Thank you very much, Jose<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>