<div dir="ltr"><div>not all have fixed ip</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature" data-smartmail="gmail_signature">--></div></div><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Wed, Mar 12, 2025 at 12:02 AM Rudy Bakalov via Dxspider-support <<a href="mailto:dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk">dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div><div style="font-family:Helvetica Neue,Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px"><div></div>
        <div dir="ltr">What about binding SSID-s to IPs? No need to share any secrets.</div><div dir="ltr"><br></div><div dir="ltr">Rudy N2WQ</div><div><br></div>
        
        <div id="m_2455285039695157630ydp2f28ed7dyahoo_quoted_2616155080">
            <div style="font-family:"Helvetica Neue",Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif;font-size:13px">
                
                <div>
                    On Tuesday, March 11, 2025 at 06:43:54 PM EDT, Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support <<a href="mailto:dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk" target="_blank">dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a>> wrote:
                </div>
                <div><br></div>
                <div><br></div>
                <div><div id="m_2455285039695157630ydp2f28ed7dyiv9312737468"><div>
    <div>There is no auth scheme that I can
      think of right now that does not involve some kind of secret
      sharing between nodes. If we are going to go down that road then
      we may as well just do the job properly and start to use PKI SSL
      connections with each node connection pair giving each other a PKI
      pair. We *may* be able to share the public keys around but we will
      need to fiddle about with client PKI certs because each side needs
      to verify the other. But that will result in a separate network of
      nodes that will trust each. Then we will get the howls of protest
      about all those juicy "missing" spots from outside this new (more)
      secure network.<br clear="none">
      <br clear="none">
      More knowledgeable information to square this circle gratefully
      received (offline please).<br clear="none">
      <br clear="none">
      Dirk<br clear="none">
      <div id="m_2455285039695157630ydp2f28ed7dyiv9312737468yqtfd75618"><br clear="none">
      On 10/03/2025 19:12, Christopher Schlegel via Dxspider-support
      wrote:<br clear="none">
    </div></div><div id="m_2455285039695157630ydp2f28ed7dyiv9312737468yqtfd58446">
    <blockquote type="cite">
      </blockquote></div></div><div id="m_2455285039695157630ydp2f28ed7dyiv9312737468yqtfd25407"><div><div>Nevermind. Theory, was not well thought out and I
        keep hitting roadblocks...
        <div><br clear="none">
        </div>
        <div>Chris, WI3W</div>
      </div>
      <br clear="none">
      <div>
        <div dir="ltr">On Mon, Mar 10, 2025, 10:06
          Christopher Schlegel <<a shape="rect" href="mailto:sutehk.cs@gmail.com" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">sutehk.cs@gmail.com</a>>
          wrote:<br clear="none">
        </div>
        <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
          <div>
            <p dir="ltr">Dirk,</p>
            <p dir="ltr">How hard would it be to implement a hashed
              check into the PC92 protocol. I.e. I log into WI3W-2,
              receive a randomly generated number/string used to verify
              tx/rx between the user and node. Kind of like pub/priv
              keys but only to generate the check. As long as the check
              is valid keep the connection, if not, boot it.</p>
            <p dir="ltr">Or, something similar. Spot validation? I'd
              expect CPU processing to tick up a little, but most
              machines in use should not choke.</p>
            <p dir="ltr">73,</p>
            <p dir="ltr">Chris, WI3W</p>
          </div>
          <br clear="none">
          <div>
            <div dir="ltr">On Mon, Mar 10, 2025,
              09:45 Mike McCarthy, W1NR via Dxspider-support <<a shape="rect" href="mailto:dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a>>
              wrote:<br clear="none">
            </div>
            <blockquote style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">A
              small number of nodes, yes, but with about 1/4 of the
              total users of <br clear="none">
              the global cluster network. VE7CC-1 alone has over 800 on
              any given day.<br clear="none">
              <br clear="none">
              On 3/10/2025 8:29 AM, Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support
              wrote:<br clear="none">
              <br clear="none">
              > Which means that input from the CCluster/ARCluster
              system would <br clear="none">
              > disappear as they are still using the same protocol
              as we are and <br clear="none">
              > therefore just as untrusted as anyone else. Their big
              advantage is that <br clear="none">
              > there are a relatively small group of nodes with an
              author (or other <br clear="none">
              <br clear="none">
              -- <br clear="none">
              73 de Mike, W1NR<br clear="none">
              <br clear="none">
              THAT was the equation. EXISTENCE!... SURVIVAL... must
              cancel out... <br clear="none">
              programming!<br clear="none">
              <br clear="none">
              - Ruk -<br clear="none">
              <br clear="none">
              <br clear="none">
              _______________________________________________<br clear="none">
              Dxspider-support mailing list<br clear="none">
              <a shape="rect" href="mailto:Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a><br clear="none">
              <a shape="rect" href="https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support</a><br clear="none">
            </blockquote>
          </div>
        </blockquote>
      </div>
      <br clear="none">
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
Dxspider-support mailing list
<a shape="rect" href="mailto:Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a>
<a shape="rect" href="https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support</a>
</pre>
    
    <br clear="none">
  </div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>Dxspider-support mailing list<br><a href="mailto:Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a><br><a href="https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support</a><br></div>
            </div>
        </div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>
Dxspider-support mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk" target="_blank">Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support</a><br>
</blockquote></div>