<div dir="ltr">Dirk,<div><br></div><div>Are we still advised to keep pc92c_ipaddr_enable set to 0, or should we be turning this back on?</div><div><br></div><div>Chris WI3W</div></div><br><div class="gmail_quote gmail_quote_container"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Fri, Apr 4, 2025 at 11:16 AM Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support <<a href="mailto:dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk">dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><u></u>

  
    
  
  <div>
    <div>On 04/04/2025 15:30, Dirk Koopman via
      Dxspider-support wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">Updated
      DXSpider nodes no longer send PC92 C records to CCClusters. It's
      possible that I will not send PC92 A & D records to him
      either, but I will need to confer whether or he wants them. At one
      point (some time ago) I believe that he said that he dumps them.</blockquote>
    <br>
    <font size="4">This is (currently) a lie. I don't send any copies of
      PC92 packets coming in from outside or broadcasts that come from
      within a node. There are direct point to point messages sent on
      startup.<br>
      <br>
      Dirk  </font><br>
  </div>

_______________________________________________<br>
Dxspider-support mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk" target="_blank">Dxspider-support@tobit.co.uk</a><br>
<a href="https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support</a><br>
</blockquote></div>