[Cluster-tech] PC61

[Dirk Koopman]

Lee Sawkins wrote:
> Dirk
> 
> I am using PC61 as a replacement for PC11 between CC Clusters.  It
> appears that some of these are "escaping" from the CC Cluster network
> and ending up on Spider.  These appear to cause a problem for Spider.  I
> don't believe they are dupe checked or have their hops decremented. 
> They appear to just circulate.

They are probably not dupe checked, but their hops should be decremented 
in all versions of the code.

> 
> PC61 has support for two digits after the decimal point.  Using PC11 for
> these type of spots caused problems, so I switched to my own unique
> protocol.

What other differences are there? Is there any reason why I couldn't 
simply use it?

Dirk