[Dxspider-support] Noprivate etc

[Roland Huysentruyt,ON6HH]

Yes You are right Collin .
We only use  'sp call ' and  'sb topic '   here . 
I wanted to say to Klaus and others it is not a problem in their spiderinstallation .
My suggestion is to remove the command in a next release .
73
Roland ,sysop on0dxk
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Roland Huysentruyt,Beatrijslaan 28,B 8870   IZEGEM , BELGIUM 
tel  (32) (0) 51 303000  email : on6hh at yucom.be    
packetmail on6hh at on0ck.wvl.bel.eu


----- Original Message ----- 
From: Colin Harris <chedward at tiscali.co.uk>
To: Spider Support <dxspider-support at dxcluster.org>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 9:14 AM
Subject: [Dxspider-support] Noprivate etc


> Hi Roland,
> 
>                   I spoke with Klaus about noprivate and it may or may not
> work with build 253, However , what I do not understand is why anyone would
> want to send / noprivate to an individual callsign. Send/noprivate has an
> alias called send/bulletin ( SB ) and so they are identical. Surely SB ALL
> would achieve the same result ( or SB LOCAL etc etc ). To use send/noprivate
> ( SB ) then first the "topic" must be set. To send noprivate ( SB ) to a
> private callsign , would not the callsign have to be first set as a bulletin
> "topic" and incorporated into the foward.pl file ?
> 
> To me it seems a moot point.
> 
> - Regards Colin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at dxcluster.org
> http://www.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support