[Dxspider-support] About SH/NOdes command

Dirk Koopman G1TLH gb7tlh at dxcluster.org
Thu Mar 19 16:04:38 GMT 2009


Luigi Carlotto, IK5ZUK wrote:

> IS0GRB-6    Spider  4947
> IT9OBK-6    Spider  1.55 build: 0.32
> IT9WDY-6    Spider  1.55 build: 0.36
> IW0GPS-6    Spider  1.55 build: 0.32
> IW5ECF-6    Spider  1.55 build: 0.26
> IZ3MEZ-8    Spider  1.55
> IZ5FSA-6    Spider  1.55 build: 0.38
> IZ6FZS-6    Spider  1.55 build: 0.36
> IZ7AUH-6    Spider  1.55 build: 0.38
> ON4KVI      Spider  1.55 build: 0.36
> PY1NB-4     Spider  1.54 build: 0.194
> RK6EWX      Spider  1.55 build: 0.36
> RV0AEV-1    Spider  1.55 build: 0.36
> S50DXS      Spider  1.55 build: 0.36
> SM7GVF-6    Spider  1.55 build: 0.36
> SV1CMG-4    Spider  1.55 build: 0.33
> SV1CPO-8    Spider  1.55 build: 0.33
> SV1DAY-5    Spider  1.55 build: 0.32
> SV2DWG-8    Spider  1.55 build: 0.38
> SV2ESB-8    Spider  1.55
> UU7J-9      Spider  1.55
> VK3AVE-4    Spider  1.55 build: 0.38
> ZL2ARN-10   Spider  1.55 build: 0.38
> 62 records
> IK5ZUK de IK5ZUK-6 15-Mar-2009 2237Z dxspider >
> 
> As you can see, for both IS0GRB-6 and IK1ZNW-6 it shows spider release 
> 4947, that is clearly wrong.
> Moreover, for IZ3MEZ-8, SV2ESB-8, UU7J-9 and IK0OZC-6 there isn't the 
> version number...
> 
> Please Dirk, could you tell me something more ?!?
> 

No, no really. Not without seeing the debug input from these stations.

What I would say is that it is likely that they are coming in via PC19 
rather than PC92. There may be a bug in the PC19 code when I changed it 
but I am not aware of one.

But is this really that important?

Dirk



More information about the Dxspider-support mailing list