[Dxspider-support] About SH/NOdes command
Dirk Koopman G1TLH
gb7tlh at dxcluster.org
Thu Mar 19 16:04:38 GMT 2009
Luigi Carlotto, IK5ZUK wrote:
> IS0GRB-6 Spider 4947
> IT9OBK-6 Spider 1.55 build: 0.32
> IT9WDY-6 Spider 1.55 build: 0.36
> IW0GPS-6 Spider 1.55 build: 0.32
> IW5ECF-6 Spider 1.55 build: 0.26
> IZ3MEZ-8 Spider 1.55
> IZ5FSA-6 Spider 1.55 build: 0.38
> IZ6FZS-6 Spider 1.55 build: 0.36
> IZ7AUH-6 Spider 1.55 build: 0.38
> ON4KVI Spider 1.55 build: 0.36
> PY1NB-4 Spider 1.54 build: 0.194
> RK6EWX Spider 1.55 build: 0.36
> RV0AEV-1 Spider 1.55 build: 0.36
> S50DXS Spider 1.55 build: 0.36
> SM7GVF-6 Spider 1.55 build: 0.36
> SV1CMG-4 Spider 1.55 build: 0.33
> SV1CPO-8 Spider 1.55 build: 0.33
> SV1DAY-5 Spider 1.55 build: 0.32
> SV2DWG-8 Spider 1.55 build: 0.38
> SV2ESB-8 Spider 1.55
> UU7J-9 Spider 1.55
> VK3AVE-4 Spider 1.55 build: 0.38
> ZL2ARN-10 Spider 1.55 build: 0.38
> 62 records
> IK5ZUK de IK5ZUK-6 15-Mar-2009 2237Z dxspider >
>
> As you can see, for both IS0GRB-6 and IK1ZNW-6 it shows spider release
> 4947, that is clearly wrong.
> Moreover, for IZ3MEZ-8, SV2ESB-8, UU7J-9 and IK0OZC-6 there isn't the
> version number...
>
> Please Dirk, could you tell me something more ?!?
>
No, no really. Not without seeing the debug input from these stations.
What I would say is that it is likely that they are coming in via PC19
rather than PC92. There may be a bug in the PC19 code when I changed it
but I am not aware of one.
But is this really that important?
Dirk
More information about the Dxspider-support
mailing list