[Dxspider-support] Weekend data

Michael Carper, Ph.D. mike at wa9pie.net
Tue Apr 1 18:55:57 BST 2025


Good point, Keith.

What are the steps for doing that?

Has anyone made any gains on identifying the offender(s)?

Mike, WA9PIE

On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 12:46 PM Keith, G6NHU via Dxspider-support <
dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:

> I read that thread a few minutes ago and Lee is making interesting
> comments, some I agree with but I think that some others are simply
> wrong.  For those who want to read it, it’s here:
> https://groups.io/g/CC-User/topic/bogus_dx_spot_attacks_on/112020247
>
> However, he raises a very important point, one which Dirk has also touched
> on (and that I’ve mentioned a couple of times) regarding AR Clusters.
>
> "Other types of software such as AR Cluster simply pass everything they
> get.  Since AR Cluster doesn't give IP addresses with their spots it makes
> it difficult to determine whether these spots are bogus or not.  A simple
> solution that is used by some sysops it to drop all AR Cluster originated
> spots!"
>
> And:
>
> "I am now blocking all spots without IP addresses.  This includes all
> spots from AR Clusters etc."
>
> It’s been proven and demonstrated that AR Cluster nodes are a weak spot on
> the network and as the creator is SK, no further development will
> happen.  For the good of the network, we need to be removing links to AR
> Cluster nodes.
>
> Hopefully Jim will be updating his dxcluster telnet list very soon which
> will give an idea of how many AR Cluster nodes are still active but the
> sooner these are all isolated or the owner changes them to something else,
> either CC Cluster or DXSpider, the better for everyone.
>
> 73 Keith.
>
> On 1 Apr 2025 at 18:19 +0100, Michael Carper, Ph.D. via Dxspider-support <
> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>, wrote:
>
> On a related note, did anyone see this?
>
> Mike, WA9PIE
>
> ===========
>
> From: CC-User at groups.io [mailto:CC-User at groups.io] On Behalf Of Lee
> Sawkins via groups.io
> Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2025 10:25 AM
> To: CC-User at groups.io
> Subject: Re: [CC-User] Bogus DX Spot Attacks on Clusters
>
> What happened this weekend was that tens of thousands of bogus spots were
> entered into the cluster system.  These spots were all for SSB.   Since
> there are no SSB skimmers available yet, all of these spots appeared to be
> manually entered, but in fact they were generated by a computer.
>
> Normally the human entered spots never are more than 60 per minute.
> During the weekend spots that were bogus were entered at many thousands per
> minute.  These spots were targeting specific active calls.  These spots
> were giving different frequencies on all contest bands for each bogus
> spot.  These spots had same DX call and a different spotter call and
> different originating cluster call.   This caused many nodes to get bogged
> down trying to process all this data.  Some crashed.  Others got hopelessly
> behind and continued sending data to my cluster which dropped the spots
> because they were too old.  Millions of spots were being dropped.
>
> My cluster limits the number of spots to 60 per minute.  This limited
> bogus spots but also good spots in each minute.  When bogus spots stopped,
> then all the new good ones got through.
>
> Lee VE7CC
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2025 at 8:45 AM Kin via Dxspider-support <
> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Absolutely brilliant 🤣🤣🤣
>>
>>
>>
>> Kin EA3CV
>>
>>
>>
>> *De:* Dxspider-support <dxspider-support-bounces at tobit.co.uk> *En nombre
>> de* Danilo Brelih via Dxspider-support
>> *Enviado el:* lunes, 31 de marzo de 2025 22:47
>> *Para:* Keith, G6NHU via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
>> *CC:* Danilo Brelih <s50u at s50e.si>
>> *Asunto:* Re: [Dxspider-support] Weekend data
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>> This is Linux land.
>> In silent nights you can hear the Windows machines rebooting.
>> https://s50clx.infrax.si
>>
>> GL Dan
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20250401/8320bc3f/attachment.htm>


More information about the Dxspider-support mailing list