[Dxspider-support] The results are in for today (so far)

[Kelly Leavitt]

What is the end game of the providers of all of the 'bad spots'?

An attempt at discrediting the service.

I will NEVER understand behavior like this, or am I misunderstanding what is going on.


________________________________
From: Dxspider-support <dxspider-support-bounces at tobit.co.uk> on behalf of Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2025 10:20 AM
To: Dxspider-Support <dxspider-support at dxcluster.org>
Cc: Dirk Koopman <djk at tobit.co.uk>
Subject: [Dxspider-support] The results are in for today (so far)

The results are in:

After setting $DXProt::senderverify to 1 or 2 (hint: I have set mine to 2)

And running the following two commands:

    grepdbg '\s+<-\s+I\s+GB7DJK\s+PC61' | wc -l

and

    grepdbg 'bad spot ' | wc -l

and noting the numbers on a piece of paper with the first command being 'A' and the second 'B' and then doing this simple calculation:

    B * 100 / A

The result I got for a morning's traffic (the natural result of a grepdbg on today's log with sendverify set) is:

        60.22 (%)

Or to put it another way, most of the traffic sent today is very likely fake.

Houston, we have a problem...

73 Dirk G1TLH

PS If you have had senderverify set > 0 for all of today, you can repeat the example above by changing 'GB7DJK' to a similar node feeding yours from which you are likely to get all/most of your spots.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20250212/625d5e4e/attachment.htm>