[Dxspider-support] Some information

[CX2SA - Jose Ma Gonzalez]

Works OK too at CX2SA-8

 

G6NHU-2 NODE DXSP normal   19-Feb-2025 1624Z

 

73

 

 

De: Dxspider-support [mailto:dxspider-support-bounces at tobit.co.uk] En nombre de ken Sharman via Dxspider-support
Enviado el: sábado, 22 de febrero de 2025 12:58
Para: The DXSpider Support list
CC: ken Sharman
Asunto: Re: [Dxspider-support] Some information

 

 Hi Anthony 

Link working here ok, 

 G6NHU-2 DXSP 18-Feb-2025 0405Z   4d 11h 49m   0.09   2    300   260     

  

Ken G7VJA 

GB7HTL         

On 02/22/2025 3:32 PM GMT Anthony (N2KI) via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote: 

  

  

Has your connection info changed?   

Connection starts but it never gets to connect. 

  
Regards,

Anthony  

   N2KI 








 

On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 8:50 AM Keith, G6NHU via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote: 

Nope, it’s up.  

73 Keith G6NHU 

On 22 Feb 2025 at 13:32 +0000, Anthony (N2KI) via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>, wrote: 



Keith, 

  

Is G6HNU-2 down? 

  
Regards,

Anthony  

   N2KI 








 

On Sat, Feb 22, 2025 at 5:11 AM Keith, G6NHU via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote: 

I’m seeing spots coming in via nodes running build 568 that are being flagged as bad.

As build 568 now has $DXProt::sendverify set to 2 by default, does that mean that the sysops have added an entry to startup that sets this back to 0?

If we’re going to take steps to secure the network and the data we pass, this sort of thing should be hard-coded!

73 Keith G6NHU

On 22 Feb 2025 at 09:01 +0000, Kin via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>, wrote: 



Perhaps we should display a list of the nodes and the number of spots that have been flagged as suspicious.

It is possible that a sysop could take steps to correct this.

 

Kin

EA3CV

 

Enviado desde Outlook para Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> 

 

De: IZ2LSC <iz2lsc.andrea at gmail.com>
Enviado el: sábado, 22 de febrero de 2025 9:44
Para: The DXSpider Support list <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
CC: Kin <ea3cv at cronux.net>
Asunto: Re: [Dxspider-support] Some information

 

I collected the % of unverified spots received by my node in 24 hrs during a normal "peaceful" working day.

This is the result.

 

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wSCPqdDAu4wF0_syKZkzArgCDZ-gxBFK/view?usp=sharing

 

So if we really decide to drop unverified spots (that most of the time are real spots, not fake or forged) we are going to drop a lot of spots.

I can understand this as a countermeasure during an attack.....but not during normal operations.

Just a consideration about the side effects.

 

73

Andrea, iz2lsc

 

 

-->

 

 

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 8:07 PM Kin via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:

Hi,

I have been analysing how a CC Cluster node behaves with pc9x supposedly
enabled, to see the suspect filtering.

The only thing that seems to work correctly is PC92K, which only reports the
node itself.
The PC92A does not show all user connections and none from a partner.
The PC92D does not show all user disconnections.
The PC92C is not generated.
I don't understand the point of generating some PC92s and not all of them.
I think it would be better not to generate any if you can't generate them
all. This would avoid ambiguities in the network.

It is clear that with incomplete information, a CC Cluster will be greatly
affected by filtering. But the vast majority (if not all - 1) do not use
PC92 like ARC, DXNet and AK1A, all their users' spots will be flagged as
suspicious.

Have a nice weekend.

Kin EA3CV



_______________________________________________
Dxspider-support mailing list
Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support

_______________________________________________ 
Dxspider-support mailing list 
Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk 
https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support 

_______________________________________________ 
Dxspider-support mailing list 
Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk 
https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support 

_______________________________________________ 
Dxspider-support mailing list 
Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk 
https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support 

_______________________________________________ 
Dxspider-support mailing list 
Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk 
https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support 

_______________________________________________ 
Dxspider-support mailing list 
Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk 
https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20250222/874acc1b/attachment.htm>