[Dxspider-support] BPQ32_409r_Beta_20050914 problem

[Ron Stordahl]

I can't see any reason why you would want to run BPQ32 or AGWPE or 
XRouter if you only offer telnet services.

I use BPQ32 because I provide radio services in two ways...from radio 
right here served by BPQ32 on the same machine, and remotely to  
distance BPQ32 instances via AX/UDP, so that remote users out of radio 
range from me can connect via radio to a local BPQ32 server and be 
redirected to me.  And since BPQ32 is a NET/ROM system, it makes 
providing services by radio to area NET/ROM systems (TheNet X1J4 for 
example) easy.  It takes care of doing the routing via the most reliable 
route.

In some ways I guess I am a hold out...still providing packet radio 
access to a dx cluster.

Ron, N5IN

Jim Reisert AD1C wrote:
> Dumb question from a novice....
>
> If I'm *NOT* running an RF cluster (i.e. Internet only), do I care about this? 
> If I should care, what advantage does this give over running DX Spider
> "straight out of the box"?  Do I need special support from the node I get spots
> from?
>
> 73 - Jim AD1C
>
>
> --
> Jim Reisert AD1C, 7 Charlemont Court, North Chelmsford, MA 01863
> USA +978-251-9933, <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>, http://www.ad1c.us
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dxspider-support mailing list
> Dxspider-support at dxcluster.org
> http://post.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>