[Dxspider-support] Doubt PC9X

[Kin]

Hi Dirk,

 

I was thinking of those sysops who have used unset/wantpc9x with relatively current releases.

 

Thanks for the explanation.

 

Kin

 

 

De: Dxspider-support <dxspider-support-bounces at tobit.co.uk> En nombre de Dirk Koopman via Dxspider-support
Enviado el: domingo, 12 de febrero de 2023 21:34
Para: Kin via Dxspider-support <dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk>
CC: Dirk Koopman <djk at tobit.co.uk>
Asunto: Re: [Dxspider-support] Doubt PC9X

 

They are one (or possibly two) of:

1. A non-DXSpider node (that may be pretending). They generally have a version that is less that 1.55 or greater than 1.57 (or just 0).
2. An isolated node. This could be DXSpider, but is more likely to be AR-C, AK1A (I am astounded that they still exist) or something else. All isolated nodes are treated as basic AK1A nodes (complete with PC16/17/19/21 instead of PC9x). 
3. A Very Old DXSpider, probably identifying as 1.54, which is pre June 2007.

Dirk G1TLH

On 12/02/2023 08:54, Kin via Dxspider-support wrote:

Hi,

 

I am curious to know why there are nodes that have PC9X = NO.

What are the advantages for them?

 

Kin EA3CV

 





_______________________________________________
Dxspider-support mailing list
Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk <mailto:Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> 
https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20230213/b03aa51d/attachment.htm>