[Dxspider-support] Missing PC92 packets

[Christopher Schlegel]

Quick note, you do not want this...

set/var $DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable = 1

That should be set to "0" as we found out it was causing issues to CCC
nodes due to the large amount of info passed by including IP addresses in
the PC92 C records causing buffer overflows. If I recall correctly...

Chris, WI3W

On Fri, Apr 4, 2025, 10:06 Christopher Schlegel <sutehk.cs at gmail.com> wrote:

> Rudy,
>
> PC92 is the routing protocol. For spots you want PC11 and PC61.
>
> https://wiki.dxcluster.org/wiki/DXSpider_PC_Packet_Cluster_Protocol
>
> watchdbg "PC11|PC61" - I think should get you what you want.
>
> Chris, WI3W
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2025, 09:27 Rudy Bakalov via Dxspider-support <
> dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> I see packets from other nodes coming in to N2WQ-73 (spider). However,
>> none of them are making it to VA3UXA-1 which is my test CCC. If I connect
>> it to other nodes, PC92 packets do show up. Why is N2WQ-73 not distributing
>> PC92 spots?
>>
>> Here's what I have in the startup script:
>>
>> #
>> set/var $DXProt::pc9x_time_tolerance = 120
>> set/var $DXProt::senderverify = 1
>> set/var $DXProt::pc92c_ipaddr_enable = 1
>> set/var $DXProt::pc92_ad_enable = 1
>> #
>>
>> In comparison, N2WQ-1 (CCC) is connected to multiple partners, both CCC
>> and spiders, and is quite busy handling PC92 packets.
>>
>> Any ideas?
>>
>> Rudy N2WQ
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Dxspider-support mailing list
>> Dxspider-support at tobit.co.uk
>> https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/dxspider-support
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.tobit.co.uk/pipermail/dxspider-support/attachments/20250404/e8435864/attachment-0001.htm>